Central Computer Failure Probability Model for Radio Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large-scale radio networks, especially in industrial settings, face challenges in maintaining reliability due to configuration errors or overloading, which can lead to production interruptions and economic damage, as existing methods focus primarily on power adjustments and configuration optimization without comprehensive failure prediction.

Innovation Solution

A method where devices in the radio network transmit cyclical operating parameters to a central computer, which creates a model to determine failure probabilities by correlating operating constellations with failures using pattern recognition algorithms, allowing for timely detection and prediction of impending network failures and generation of warning signals when thresholds are exceeded.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If power adjustment methods are used to optimize radio network operations, then network configuration and control are improved, but comprehensive failure prediction capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork configuration and controlVSAvoidfailure prediction capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously collecting operating parameters and creating a model that assigns failure probabilities to operating constellations before actual failures occur. This allows proactive identification of critical situations and preventive measures to be taken, resolving the contradiction by enabling both operational control and failure prediction capability simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring operating parameters, comparing current operating constellations against the trained model, and generating warnings when failure probabilities exceed thresholds. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enhances both network control and reliability by providing real-time insights and enabling corrective actions before failures occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Duration of action of stationary object

If transmission power is adjusted to maintain network operations, then network continuity is improved, but comprehensive monitoring of failure risks deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork continuityVSAvoidfailure risk monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves multi-functionality by integrating both network control functions (power adjustment) and failure prediction functions into a single comprehensive monitoring system. The central computer performs both operational parameter adjustment and failure probability assessment, eliminating the need for separate systems and enabling simultaneous improvement of network continuity and failure risk detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary element - the trained model that assigns failure probabilities to operating constellations - which mediates between raw operating parameters and failure predictions. This intermediary enables comprehensive failure risk monitoring without interfering with network continuity maintenance, as it processes information separately and provides independent risk assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If pattern recognition algorithms are implemented for failure prediction, then failure detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically collecting operating parameters, training the pattern recognition model using historical data, and performing failure predictions without requiring external intervention. The central computer autonomously manages the entire process from data collection to failure detection, improving accuracy while managing complexity through automation rather than manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies periodic action by cyclically collecting operating parameters from radio network devices and periodically updating the failure probability model. This structured periodic data collection and model updating approach improves detection accuracy through consistent monitoring while managing system complexity through regular, predictable operations rather than continuous complex processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11159388B2Method for detecting and determining a failure probability of a radio network and central computer
Publication Date: 2021.10.26 AUDI AG
  • US11159388B2 patent drawing
  • US11159388B2 patent drawing
  • US11159388B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present application relates to a method for detecting and determining a failure probability (pA) of a radio network. The method is characterized in that devices of the radio network cyclically transmit operating parameters to a central computer wherein each transmitted operating parameter comprises an operating value of the respective device and a detection time point (t) of the operating value. All transmitted parameters and values can be viewed at any time by accessing the central computer. The central computer cyclically stores the operating values of all operating parameters detected within a predefined time interval (T) as the respective operating constellation and checks the radio network for a failure (A). The central computer cyclically creates a model based on the stored operating constellations and failures (A), which assigns a failure probability (pA) to each possible operating constellation.