Central entry dual rotor cavitation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cavitation devices are inefficient in mixing fluids with high viscosities, densities, or high solid concentrations, as they fail to effectively account for fluid properties and direct flow patterns, leading to excessive energy wastage and suboptimal mixing results.

Innovation Solution

The use of two parallel cavitation rotors with a central inlet and tangential fluid entry, combined with optional discs and radial ribs, to harness viscous drag and enhance the cavitation effect, ensuring efficient mixing by directing fluid flow through a cavitation zone with outlets positioned to maximize exposure to the process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single rotor with orthogonal inlet ports is used, then the device can handle fluid flow, but excessive drag is generated and energy is wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid throughput rateVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The single rotor is divided into two parallel rotors, each handling a portion of the fluid flow independently. This segmentation reduces the drag on each rotor and optimizes the cavitation effect, thereby reducing energy waste while maintaining high throughput capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a single-rotor configuration to a dual-rotor parallel configuration, adding a spatial dimension to the mixing process. This allows fluid to be introduced centrally and distributed between two rotors, reducing drag and energy consumption while maintaining mixing effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If fluid is directed toward the face of the rotor, then mixing occurs, but viscous drag retards rotation and reduces efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing effectivenessVSAvoidrotational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of directing fluid toward the face of the rotor (orthogonal entry), the invention introduces fluid centrally between the two parallel rotors, allowing the rotors to interact with the fluid from the sides. This inverted approach reduces viscous drag on rotation while maintaining mixing effectiveness through cavitation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Productivity

If prior art cavitation devices are used, then mixing is achieved, but dense materials with high viscosities and solids are not well mixed at desired flow rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesired flow rateVSAvoidmixing quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The fluid stream is divided and processed by two parallel rotors simultaneously, each creating cavitation effects that effectively mix dense materials with high viscosities and solids content. This segmented approach maintains mixing quality at higher flow rates than single-rotor devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the operational parameters by using two rotors rotating in opposite directions, creating enhanced cavitation effects that improve mixing of challenging fluids (dense, high viscosity, high solids) at desired throughput rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration significantly reduces energy consumption and enhances mixing efficiency, particularly at high flow rates, achieving better mixing results with challenging fluids like dense drilling muds by optimizing the cavitation process and flow patterns.

Implementation Method 1

A cavitation zone is formed between a rotating cylindrical or other surface and a conforming housing surface, the rotating surface containing numerous cavities. The cavitation effect achieved by the mini-violent turbulence in and around the cavities is known.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCavitation: Cavitation

Implementation Method 2

One or more optional discs may be deployed in parallel to the rotors to augment the use of viscous drag to turn the rotors and moderate energy consumption while optimizing the desirable cavitation and mixing effects.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscous drag: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS10427117B2Central entry dual rotor cavitation
Publication Date: 2019.10.01 HIGHLAND FLUID TECH
  • US10427117B2 patent drawing
  • US10427117B2 patent drawing
  • US10427117B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is described of mixing fluid materials, including solids and gases. The materials to be mixed are introduced between two cylindrical rotors mounted in parallel on a motorized shaft. The rotors have arrays of cavities on their cylindrical surfaces and rotate within close proximity to the interior of a cylindrical shell. Passage of the fluid between the rotating rotors and the interior surface of the cylindrical shell causes cavitation, which mixes the materials. The mixture is passed to outlets on the far sides of the rotors from the inlet. Apparatus is described for extending the flow path of the materials and thus increasing exposure to the cavitation process.