Centralized Firmware Management for Server Components

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In data centers, managing firmware updates across multiple components with different update schedules is time-consuming and error-prone, especially as the number of components increases, due to challenges in identifying and controlling non-volatile memory (NVM) and ensuring compatibility between components.

Innovation Solution

A remote software storage and loading system that centralizes firmware management, allowing updates to be stored and managed in a central repository, eliminating the need for local storage on components and enabling simultaneous updates across multiple nodes with minimal downtime, while ensuring secure and efficient provisioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If firmware updates are managed locally on each component, then components can operate independently, but managing updates across multiple components becomes time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefirmware update managementVSAvoidupdate application time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

A central management system acts as an intermediary between the administrator and multiple components. This system receives update commands, identifies target components, retrieves firmware images, and coordinates the update process across multiple nodes simultaneously, eliminating the need for manual local updates on each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple firmware management functions (update scheduling, firmware storage, component identification, and update execution) into a single centralized system. This merging allows coordinated updates across multiple components to be performed as one unified operation rather than separate manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple components have different update schedules, then each component can be updated independently, but compatibility errors increase and management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate scheduling flexibilityVSAvoidupdate management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The central management system implements feedback mechanisms by monitoring component statuses, tracking update progress, and receiving acknowledgments from targeted components. This feedback loop allows the system to coordinate updates across multiple components, ensure compatibility, and manage complex update schedules automatically without increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts update schedules and coordinates timing across multiple components based on system state, component readiness, and compatibility requirements. This dynamic coordination allows flexible scheduling while maintaining compatibility and reducing management complexity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If firmware images are stored locally on each component, then components can operate autonomously, but security risks increase and storage space is wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent autonomyVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the firmware storage function from individual components and consolidates it in a central management system. Components no longer store firmware images locally, eliminating security risks associated with local storage while maintaining operational autonomy through on-demand firmware retrieval from the centralized secure repository.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If updates are applied to multiple components sequentially, then each update can be verified, but total update time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate verificationVSAvoidupdate speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the update process into distinct phases: command issuance, firmware retrieval, and verification. Multiple components can simultaneously execute the retrieval and application phases while the central system coordinates verification, enabling parallel processing that maintains reliability through structured verification while significantly reducing total update time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12067405B2Run-time configuration loading
Publication Date: 2024.08.20 NVIDIA CORP
  • US12067405B2 patent drawing
  • US12067405B2 patent drawing
  • US12067405B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Configurations for communication interfaces are disclosed. In at least one embodiment, a processor includes one or more circuits to determine a firmware configuration for one or more server components and to transmit the firmware configuration at startup.