Central Fuel Injection for Pre-Ignition Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing engine technologies face challenges in mitigating pre-ignition events in high compression ratio engines, leading to increased particulate matter emissions and fuel consumption due to direct injection methods, which can result in engine component damage and inefficient fuel use.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method that selectively increases fuel delivery via central fuel injection (CFI) relative to port and direct injection, maintaining a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, to leverage manifold charge cooling and reduce the need for cylinder enrichment, thereby mitigating pre-ignition without increasing emissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If direct injection is used to cool the charge and mitigate pre-ignition, then pre-ignition is reduced, but particulate matter emissions increase due to insufficient fuel-air mixing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepre-ignition mitigationVSAvoidparticulate matter emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel injection system is segmented into multiple injection locations: central fuel injection into the intake manifold and port/direct injection into cylinders. This segmentation allows the central injection to provide charge cooling without the harmful effects of direct cylinder injection, while port/direct injection maintains proper fuel-air mixing for combustion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The intake manifold serves as an intermediary medium where central fuel injection occurs. Fuel injected into the manifold cools the charge through evaporation before air-fuel mixture enters cylinders, avoiding direct injection into cylinders that causes poor mixing and soot formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If cylinder enrichment is used to mitigate pre-ignition, then pre-ignition is reduced, but fuel consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepre-ignition mitigationVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Charge cooling is applied locally at the intake manifold level rather than requiring enrichment of individual cylinders. The central fuel injection cools the incoming charge for all cylinders uniformly, providing pre-ignition mitigation without the fuel penalty of cylinder-by-cylinder enrichment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If multiple cylinders are enriched concurrently to address pre-ignition, then pre-ignition is mitigated, but fuel consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepre-ignition mitigationVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Central fuel injection into the intake manifold provides a universal cooling effect for all cylinders simultaneously. A single injection point serves multiple cylinders, providing pre-ignition mitigation across the engine without the cumulative fuel consumption of enriching multiple cylinders individually

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the propensity for pre-ignition, improves fuel efficiency, and decreases particulate matter emissions by utilizing charge cooling effects across all cylinders, minimizing the need for enrichment and associated fuel consumption.

Implementation Method 1

When fuel is injected into the engine intake, heat is transferred from the intake air and/or local engine components to the fuel and this heat transfer leads to atomization of a portion of the fuel, which results in cooling of the manifold, and thereby cooling of the manifold air charge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

heat is transferred from the intake air and/or local engine components to the fuel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS20180320625A1Methods and system for central fuel injection
Publication Date: 2018.11.08 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US20180320625A1 patent drawing
  • US20180320625A1 patent drawing
  • US20180320625A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for adjusting engine operating conditions for mitigation of pre-ignition in one or more engine cylinder. In one example, a method may include, in response to indication of pre-ignition, manifold charge cooling may be increased by increasing the portion of fuel delivered to the engine via manifold injection relative to the portion to fuel delivered via one or more of port and direct injection, while maintaining engine operation at or around a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio.