Central Plant Asset Allocation Under Real-Time Energy Pricing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Central plants face challenges in optimally allocating energy loads across subplants due to real-time pricing fluctuations and the need to minimize production costs while meeting energy demands efficiently.

Innovation Solution

An asset allocator system that identifies sources, subplants, and sinks, generates a cost function, and solves an optimization problem to determine the optimal energy load allocation, considering resource balance constraints, storage, and incentive programs, to minimize economic costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If energy resources are produced exactly when required by the load, then the energy demand is met reliably, but the production cost increases due to real-time pricing fluctuations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy demand fulfillmentVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by producing and storing energy resources before peak demand periods when pricing is lower. The asset allocator schedules energy production in advance during off-peak hours and stores it in energy storage systems, then discharges the stored energy during high-demand periods when real-time pricing is higher, thereby reducing production costs while maintaining reliable energy supply.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If energy loads are allocated without optimization across subplants, then the system operation is simple, but the economic efficiency deteriorates due to inability to minimize production costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation simplicityVSAvoideconomic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The asset allocator implements feedback by continuously monitoring real-time pricing signals, energy storage states, subplant operational status, and load demands. It dynamically adjusts energy allocation decisions based on this feedback, optimizing the distribution of energy loads across subplants to minimize production costs while responding to changing economic conditions and system states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies dynamics by making the energy allocation strategy adaptive and flexible rather than static. The asset allocator continuously reoptimizes energy distribution across subplants based on real-time pricing fluctuations, storage availability, and load variations, allowing the system to dynamically respond to changing economic and operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of energy

If energy storage is used to manipulate resource consumption timing, then the production cost decreases by producing during low-cost periods, but the system complexity increases due to storage management requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction costVSAvoidstorage management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The asset allocator serves multiple functions simultaneously: it optimizes energy allocation across subplants, manages energy storage charging and discharging, responds to real-time pricing signals, and coordinates with incentive programs. By integrating these diverse functions into a single optimization framework, the system reduces overall complexity despite the added capability of storage management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240403757A1Central plant with asset allocator
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
  • US20240403757A1 patent drawing
  • US20240403757A1 patent drawing
  • US20240403757A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A controller for chillers that operate to serve a cooling load of a building or facility obtains a first balance constraint that requires balance between chilled water production and consumption and obtains a second balance constraint that requires balance between water, electricity, or steam consumption and production. The controller solves a control problem using the first balance constraint and the second balance constraint to determine an amount of the chilled water to be produced by the chillers and an amount of the water, electricity, or steam to be consumed by the chillers or other equipment. The controller operates the chillers in accordance with a setpoint to consume the amount of the water, electricity, or steam or produce the amount of the chilled water determined by solving the control problem. The amount of chilled water is delivered for use in serving the cooling load of the building or facility.