Central Rod Cross-Links for Bilateral Spinal Stress Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinal stabilization systems using screws and rods often fail to adequately distribute stress across the spine, leading to strain on neurological elements and limited correction of spinal deformities, particularly in cases of trauma, tumor, disc degeneration, and disease.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a central rod system comprising cross-links with central rod holders and extension members attached to fixation members, such as hooks with serrations and side-cuts, which are secured to vertebral bodies to create a stable spinal stabilization system that distributes stress bilaterally and allows for centralized sagittal plane correction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional screw and rod systems are used for spinal stabilization, then fixation to vertebral bodies is achieved, but stress is not adequately distributed across the spine leading to strain on neurological elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal stabilization effectivenessVSAvoidstrain on neurological elements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The spinal stabilization system is segmented into multiple cross-links, each comprising a central rod holder and extension members that attach to fixation members on opposite sides of the spine. This segmentation allows stress to be distributed across multiple bilateral attachment points rather than concentrated at single rod-screw interfaces, thereby reducing strain on neurological elements while maintaining effective stabilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from traditional unidirectional rod attachment to a bilateral three-dimensional configuration with cross-links extending across the mid-line of the spine. This dimensional change enables stress distribution in multiple directions (bilateral, multi-level) rather than along a single rod axis, improving stress distribution and reducing harmful strain on neural structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Stability of the object's composition

If traditional rod systems are used, then spinal segments are connected, but rod bending occurs and correction of spinal deformities is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal segment connectionVSAvoidrod bending and deformity correction capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The rod system is segmented into multiple cross-links with central rod holders positioned at different spinal levels. Each cross-link acts as an independent structural unit that can be adjusted and secured separately, allowing for better control of rod positioning and reduced bending while connecting multiple spinal segments for comprehensive deformity correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates adjustable cross-links with extension members that can be positioned and secured at optimal angles and locations. This dynamic adjustability allows the rod system to accommodate spinal deformities more effectively and maintain proper alignment without excessive rod bending, enabling intuitive vertebral rotation and centralized sagittal plane correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If multiple cross-links are installed for stress distribution, then spinal stability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal stabilityVSAvoidnumber of cross-links and fixation members
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple fixation members (screws or hooks) are merged into integrated cross-link assemblies that connect to a central rod holder. This merging reduces the number of separate components and attachment steps compared to traditional systems, simplifying installation while maintaining the stress-distributing benefits of multiple bilateral attachments across several spinal levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cross-link design incorporates universal features including central rod holders that can accommodate standard rods, extension members that can attach to various fixation member types (screws or hooks), and modular construction that allows adaptation to different spinal levels and deformity patterns. This multi-functionality reduces device complexity by using standardized components across multiple attachment points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11510706B2Systems for spinal stabilization
Publication Date: 2022.11.29 GLOBUS MEDICAL INC
  • US11510706B2 patent drawing
  • US11510706B2 patent drawing
  • US11510706B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, devices and methods related to spinal stabilization are provided. A system can comprise a plurality of cross-links. Each of the cross-links can include a central rod holder that extends substantially along a mid-line of the spine and a pair of extension members extending from the central rod holder. The extension members can be secured to a vertebral body via a fixation device, such as a spinal screw or a hook member having serrations and/or side-cuts. One or more rod members can be extended across the central rod holders of the cross-links, thereby forming a stable spinal stabilization system providing bilateral stress distribution across different levels of the spine.