Centralized Alert Management System for Building Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing building safety and communication systems are fragmented, leading to increased installation and maintenance complexities, limited alert delivery methods, and inefficiencies in notifying occupants, particularly those with special requirements, as each system operates independently without alternative alert mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A centralized system with sensing units, alert generating units, and a control unit that uses visual indicators to alert occupants of various events, such as door interactions or smoke detection, across multiple systems, allowing for reduced hardware requirements and improved alert perception, including for hearing-impaired individuals, by rendering alerts on user devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple independent systems are installed for different safety functions, then each system can perform its dedicated function, but installation and maintenance complexities increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidinstallation and maintenance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple independent safety systems (smoke detection, intrusion detection, fire detection) into a single centralized alert management system. Instead of having separate systems operating independently, the invention integrates them under one unified platform that shares common hardware components, processing units, and alert delivery mechanisms, thereby reducing installation and maintenance complexities while maintaining system reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized alert management system is designed to perform multiple functions through a single system. It can detect various types of events (smoke, intrusion, fire), process different sensor inputs, and deliver alerts through multiple channels (visual indicators, audio indicators, mobile device notifications). This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate dedicated systems for each safety function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional alert systems are used, then simple hardware can be deployed, but alert delivery methods are limited and may not reach all occupants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware simplicityVSAvoidalert delivery versatility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The alert management system incorporates multiple alert delivery mechanisms within a single platform. It can generate visual indicators through display devices, produce audio indicators through speakers, and send notifications to mobile devices via communication networks. This multi-channel approach ensures that alerts can reach occupants regardless of their location or accessibility needs, while still using relatively simple hardware components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a communication network as an intermediary between the alert generation components and the occupants. This allows alerts to be transmitted electronically to mobile devices, providing an additional delivery channel that complements traditional local alert methods (visual and audio indicators). The communication network acts as a mediator that extends the reach of the alert system beyond the physical premises

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Extent of automation

If separate systems operate independently, then each system can function autonomously, but alternative alert mechanisms are unavailable when one system fails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem autonomyVSAvoidalert delivery reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By merging multiple safety functions into a centralized system with shared components, the invention creates redundancy. If one alert delivery mechanism fails (e.g., visual indicator), the system can switch to alternative mechanisms (e.g., audio indicator or mobile notification). This interdependence of components within the unified system provides failover capabilities that independent systems lack

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates backup alert delivery mechanisms in advance. Instead of relying on a single alert method, the centralized system is designed with multiple alternative alert channels ready beforehand. This ensures that if one mechanism fails, others are already in place to provide alert delivery, cushioning against potential failures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS20240395118A1Alert management system
Publication Date: 2024.11.28 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US20240395118A1 patent drawing
  • US20240395118A1 patent drawing
  • US20240395118A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Approaches for managing alerts on detecting occurrence of a plurality of events within a premises, are described. According to one example, a control unit and a plurality of alert generating units may be provided. The control unit may receive sensor data generated by a sensing unit. The sensor data may then be processed to ascertain occurrence of an event from among the plurality of events. Once the event is ascertained, a set of visual indicators, from among one or more visual indicators, associated with the event may be identified for being rendered by at least one alert generating unit, from among the plurality of alert generating units. Further, an activation signal may be transmitted to the at least one alert generating unit for rendering the set of visual indicators to indicate occurrence of the event.