Centralized Beam Pair Selection for Full Duplex Interference Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communications systems face challenges in complex and dynamic environments that attenuate or block signals, leading to issues such as self-interference and cross-link interference in full duplex communications, which affect beam determination accuracy and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A centralized beam determination method is implemented at a wireless node to coordinate beam measurement and reporting, identifying optimal beams for full duplex communications and reducing self-interference and cross-link interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If full duplex communications are implemented to improve spectral efficiency and data rate, then communication productivity increases, but self-interference and cross-link interference occur that degrade signal quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidself-interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a centralized wireless node (gNB) as an intermediary to perform centralized beam determination. This mediator collects beam measurement reports from multiple UEs, processes the information centrally, and determines optimal beam pairs that minimize self-interference and cross-link interference while maximizing spectral efficiency for full duplex communications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where UEs provide beam measurement reports to the centralized wireless node. The node uses this feedback information to iteratively optimize beam selections, adjusting beam pairs based on measured interference levels and channel conditions to achieve optimal full duplex operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If distributed beam determination is used to reduce complexity, then device complexity decreases, but beam determination accuracy deteriorates due to inability to coordinate interference management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam determination complexityVSAvoidbeam determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized wireless node acts as a mediator that consolidates the complex beam determination task. Instead of each UE independently determining beams (distributed approach), the centralized node collects measurement data from all UEs and performs unified beam selection, achieving both coordination for accuracy and reasonable complexity distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the beam determination functions of multiple UEs into a single centralized decision-making process. By combining beam measurement reports from multiple UEs and performing unified beam pair selection, the system achieves coordinated interference management that improves beam determination accuracy while managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If multiple candidate beams are evaluated to improve beam quality, then beam determination accuracy increases, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam determination accuracyVSAvoidbeam determination time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system evaluates multiple candidate beams (excessive action) to ensure optimal beam selection for full duplex communications. By examining more beam options than strictly necessary, the system identifies beam pairs that best minimize interference while maintaining acceptable processing time through efficient centralized algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary beam measurements and collects candidate beam information before final beam determination. UEs pre-evaluate multiple candidate beams and report measurements to the centralized node, which then performs efficient selection from the pre-filtered candidate set, reducing real-time processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250350336A1Centralized beam determination for full duplex communications
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20250350336A1 patent drawing
  • US20250350336A1 patent drawing
  • US20250350336A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide techniques for centralized beam determination for full duplex (FD) communications. An example method, performed by a wireless node, includes obtaining at least one report indicating information regarding candidate beams, selecting, from the candidate beams, a pair of beams based on the information, and outputting, for transmission, signaling indicating that at least one user equipment (UE) is to use the pair of beams for full duplex (FD) wireless communications on a first link and a second link.