Centralized Private-Network Control Lists for Secure Communication
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing network communication technologies face challenges in maintaining security and configuration complexity, especially when integrating computing systems with diverse firewall and security measures, leading to cumbersome network management.
Innovation Solution
A coordination service manages control lists and accessibility by identifying allowed computing elements, determining encryption and addressing information, and transmitting this information to the elements, enabling secure and efficient communication within a private network.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Manufacturing precision
If individual network configuration and security rules are applied to each computing element, then security control precision is improved, but device complexity and ease of operation deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent merges individual computing elements into groups or organizational units, applying security rules at the group level rather than individually. This reduces configuration complexity while maintaining security precision through hierarchical control, where group-level policies automatically apply to member elements.
Solution Approach 2:
The coordination service provides universal security management functionality across diverse computing elements with different firewall and security measures. A single coordination service instance manages multiple computing elements, providing multi-functional security control that works across heterogeneous systems.
2Adaptability or versatility
If diverse firewall and security measures are integrated across different computing systems, then adaptability is improved, but ease of operation and device complexity worsen
Solution Approach 1:
The coordination service acts as an intermediary between diverse computing elements and the centralized management system. It translates various firewall and security measures into a unified control format, enabling diverse security measures to be managed through a single interface without requiring direct configuration of each system.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent segments security management into two layers: centralized policy definition at the coordination service level, and localized enforcement at the computing element level. This segmentation allows diverse security measures to be integrated through a common management interface while maintaining local adaptability.
3Ease of operation
If centralized coordination service manages all computing elements, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
Computing elements perform self-service by automatically receiving and applying security policies from the coordination service. They autonomously configure their local firewall and security settings based on centralized directives, reducing the operational burden on administrators while distributing the implementation complexity across multiple elements.
Data Source
AI summary
The technology described herein manages control lists and accessibility for computing elements in a private network. In one implementation, a method includes, in a coordination service, identifying computing elements allowed access to the private network and determining a subset of the computing elements is allowed to communicate with one another. The method also includes determining encryption information and addressing information for respective elements in the subset of the computing elements. The method then includes transmitting the encryption information and the addressing information to the respective elements in the subset of the computing elements.