Centralized Controller Fire Suppression System
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing vehicle fire suppression systems lack advanced automation and programmability, making them less effective in detecting fires and releasing extinguishing agents efficiently, particularly in complex or variable hazard environments.
Innovation Solution
A centralized controller-based system with input and output buses, integrated fire detection and actuation circuits, and a user interface for programming operational parameters, including threshold levels, time delays, and discharge sequences, allowing for both automatic and manual operation and expansion to protect multiple hazards.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If existing vehicle fire suppression systems are used, then the system structure is simple, but the detection and actuation capabilities are insufficient for complex hazard environments
Solution Approach 1:
The system is divided into separate functional modules: detection circuit with multiple fire detection devices, centralized controller with input/output buses, releasing circuit with actuating devices, and user interface device. This segmentation allows each module to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system reliability for complex hazard environments.
Solution Approach 2:
The centralized controller serves multiple functions: receiving signals from detection devices via input buses, processing logic operations, controlling releasing circuits through output buses, and interfacing with user interface devices. This multi-functionality improves detection and actuation capabilities without proportionally increasing system complexity.
2Adaptability or versatility
If existing fire suppression systems are used, then the system is easy to operate, but the programmability and customization for various hazards are limited
Solution Approach 1:
The user interface device includes programmable functionality that allows users to configure detection thresholds, time delays, and discharge sequences directly through the interface. The system provides self-service programming capabilities without requiring external programming equipment, enabling customization for various hazards while maintaining ease of operation.
Solution Approach 2:
The system allows dynamic configuration of operational parameters including detection threshold levels, time delay settings, and discharge sequences. These parameters can be programmed and adjusted based on specific hazard requirements, providing adaptability while maintaining user-friendly operation through the integrated user interface.
3Extent of automation
If existing fire suppression systems are used, then the system has basic detection functionality, but the automation level and response efficiency are insufficient
Solution Approach 1:
The centralized controller continuously monitors input buses for fire detection signals and pre-configures release parameters including time delays and discharge sequences. When a fire condition is detected, the controller immediately executes the pre-programmed release sequence, minimizing response time delay while maintaining high automation level.
Solution Approach 2:
The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the centralized controller receives continuous signals from fire detection devices via input buses, processes the information, and automatically triggers the releasing circuit through output buses. The user interface device provides feedback on system status and programmed parameters, enabling automatic detection and release with optimized response timing.
4Adaptability or versatility
If existing fire suppression systems are used, then the system has fixed functionality, but the expandability for protecting multiple hazards is limited
Solution Approach 1:
The centralized controller with input and output buses provides a universal platform that can accommodate multiple detection devices and actuating devices for different hazard types. The system architecture allows expansion to protect multiple hazards by adding detection devices to input buses and actuating devices to output buses without fundamental system redesign.
Solution Approach 2:
The modular architecture with separate detection circuits, centralized controller, releasing circuits, and user interface devices enables independent expansion of each module. Detection devices can be added to monitor additional hazards, and actuating devices can be configured for different suppression agents, allowing system expansion without proportionally increasing overall complexity.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 1A
Figure 2
AI summary
Fire suppression systems for vehicles and industrial applications including arrangements of an input bus and output bus coupled to a centralized controller to provide for automatic and manual detection of a fire and manual and automatic system actuation in response to the fire. The arrangements further provide for system information regarding the status and operation of the system components. Additionally, the arrangement of system components provide for expandability and programmability to configure the system for the protection of multiple and variable hazards using customized or programmed detection and/or actuation. The systems include configured connectors and color coded schemes to facilitate system installation.