Centralized Error Detection for Networked Output Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Networked output devices in commercial and educational settings often fail to display identical content, leading to the potential display of embarrassing or inappropriate material, necessitating a method to remotely detect and correct discrepancies in output data.

Innovation Solution

An error detection system comprising a processor that aggregates output data from multiple networked devices, compares it with a sample, and signals discrepancies exceeding a threshold, allowing for defaulting to predetermined content to prevent unwanted output.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If output data is transmitted to multiple networked devices, then content delivery is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent deliveryVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A central server acts as an intermediary to manage content distribution to multiple networked output devices. The server aggregates output data and compares it with sample data from individual devices, eliminating the need for each device to perform complex self-diagnosis and enabling centralized error detection and correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring output data from networked devices, comparing it with expected samples, and providing correction signals when discrepancies are detected. This closed-loop approach ensures consistent content delivery while managing device complexity through centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If error detection is performed on each device, then reliability is improved, but measurement precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The central server serves as an intermediary that performs error detection by comparing output data from multiple devices with sample data. This approach improves reliability through centralized monitoring while reducing the measurement precision burden on individual devices, as they only need to transmit data rather than perform complex comparison operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If output data is aggregated from multiple devices, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The central server acts as an intermediary that aggregates output data from multiple networked devices and performs comparison operations. This enables improved productivity through centralized data collection and analysis while keeping individual devices simple, as they only need to transmit their output data without performing complex aggregation or comparison functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9223646B2Error detection systems and methods
Publication Date: 2015.12.29 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US9223646B2 patent drawing
  • US9223646B2 patent drawing
  • US9223646B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Error detection systems and methods are provided. An error detection system (100) can include a plurality of networked output devices (110) and a processor (130) coupled via a network (120) to the plurality of output devices. The processor can be configured to aggregate output data (135) from at least a portion of a plurality of parallel, networked, output devices. The processor can be further configured to compare (140) the aggregated output data with an output data sample selected from one of the plurality of output devices and detect (145) a discrepancy between the output data sample and the aggregated output data. The processor can also be configured to compare (150) the detected discrepancy to a predetermined threshold and signal (155) when the detected discrepancy exceeds the predetermined threshold.