Centralized Operation Defense System for Multi-Service Risk Evaluation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing defense mechanisms in complex infrastructure systems require high labor costs, duplicate effort, and high maintenance due to separate configuration of each operation system, lack of accumulated experience, and inefficient coverage and efficiency in preventing misoperations and anomalies.
Innovation Solution
A centralized operation defense method and device that receives operation requests through a shared interface, selects appropriate risk evaluation algorithms from a shared library based on operation objects, initiators, and parameters, performs risk evaluations, and determines whether to allow the operation request through weighted calculations, ensuring high availability and stability.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If separate manual configuration of defense mechanisms is used for each operation system, then defense coverage can be customized for each system, but labor costs and maintenance costs increase significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The patent creates a universal defense mechanism platform that serves multiple operation systems simultaneously. The centralized configuration system can defend across different business systems and operation types (release, configuration, data operations, machine operations) through a single unified interface, eliminating the need for separate manual configuration for each system while maintaining comprehensive defense coverage.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent segments the defense mechanism into modular components: a centralized configuration system, multiple operation systems with standardized interfaces, and pluggable risk evaluation algorithms. This segmentation allows the core defense logic to be centralized while maintaining flexibility for different operation types through standardized API interfaces and algorithm plugins.
2Reliability
If manual defense configuration is performed for each new business system, then defense rules can be tailored to specific business needs, but development effort is duplicated
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements preliminary action by pre-configuring standardized defense interfaces and risk evaluation algorithms in the centralized system. When a new business system is added, the standardized interface allows immediate integration without manual configuration, and pre-built algorithms can be quickly adapted to specific business needs through parameter adjustment rather than redevelopment.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses copying by replicating the standardized defense interface pattern across different business systems. Once the interface and algorithm framework is established, it can be copied and applied to multiple systems with minimal modification, eliminating redundant development effort while maintaining defense accuracy through systematic parameter configuration.
3Stability of the object's composition
If synchronized modification of all systems is required when defense mechanisms need updating, then consistency across systems is maintained, but maintenance cost increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent merges the defense configuration and update operations into a single centralized system. All defense rules, algorithms, and configurations are managed centrally, allowing updates to be made in one location and automatically propagated to all connected operation systems. This maintains defense consistency across systems while eliminating the need for synchronized modifications, significantly improving maintenance efficiency.
4Ease of operation
If manual defense configuration relies on personnel experience and attention, then flexible judgment can be made, but experience cannot be accumulated and coverage cannot be ensured
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements feedback mechanisms where risk evaluation algorithms continuously learn from operation patterns and outcomes. The system collects data from multiple operation systems, analyzes risk patterns through automated algorithms, and updates defense rules based on accumulated experience. This transforms manual expert judgment into automated, accumulative intelligence that improves coverage and consistency while maintaining operational flexibility through configurable parameters.
Data Source
AI summary
An operation defense method and device, apparatus and computer-readable storage medium are provided. The method includes: receiving an operation request from a business system through a shared interface; according to a parameter carried in the operation request, selecting at least one risk evaluation algorithm for the operation request from an algorithm rule library shared by a plurality of service systems; performing risk evaluation to the operation request with the selected risk evaluation algorithm; and according to a risk evaluation result, determining to allow the operation request. In the present application, a centralized operation defense mechanism is used to analyze the operation requests from different service systems and to select an appropriate risk evaluation algorithm to calculate the risk coefficient of each operation request, so that an operation with a high risk can be prevented, and a diffusion range of an abnormality can be reduced.