Centralized Palletizing Patterns for Multi-Robot Adaptability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated palletizing systems are not adaptable to different packing conditions and environments, and most palletizing software is designed for a single robot or not based on any robot, limiting their flexibility and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A centralized palletizing software system that stores stacking patterns for multiple robots in a central database, using non-dimensional data to reduce the number of patterns needed and allowing for easy expansion to accommodate additional robots, with automated pattern selection and integration with programmable logic controllers (PLCs).

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If palletizing software is designed for a single robot or not based on any robot, then the software can operate independently, but the system lacks adaptability to different packing conditions and environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different packing conditionsVSAvoidsoftware architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the palletizing software into modular components: a centralized pattern library storing stacking patterns, robot-specific interface modules, and configuration files. This segmentation allows the core pattern library to remain adaptable while robot-specific adaptations are handled through separate interface layers, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal centralized pattern library that serves multiple robots and different packing conditions. The pattern library stores generic stacking patterns that can be applied across different robot types and environments, providing multi-functionality. Robot-specific adaptations are achieved through configuration parameters rather than separate software instances, enhancing adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If stacking patterns are stored individually for each robot, then each robot has dedicated patterns, but pattern maintenance becomes laborious and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern maintenance easeVSAvoidpattern maintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges all robot-specific stacking patterns into a single centralized pattern library. Instead of maintaining separate pattern files for each robot, the system consolidates patterns centrally with robot identification embedded in the pattern data structure. This merging eliminates redundant pattern copies and enables single-point maintenance, directly addressing the contradiction between operational ease and time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses digital copying mechanisms where patterns are stored once centrally and automatically distributed to multiple robots as needed. When a pattern is updated in the central library, the change is automatically copied to all relevant robots, eliminating manual pattern replication and reducing maintenance time while maintaining pattern accessibility for each robot.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If the system stores detailed dimensional data for each pattern, then pattern precision is high, but the number of patterns that need to be stored increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestacking pattern precisionVSAvoidnumber of patterns to store
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms detailed dimensional pattern data into parameter-based definitions. Instead of storing complete geometric descriptions for each pattern, the system stores compact parameter sets (e.g., case dimensions, pallet dimensions, stacking geometry ratios) that can be scaled and adapted. This parameterization maintains precision by allowing accurate calculation of stacking patterns for various case sizes while dramatically reducing the number of stored patterns through mathematical generalization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from storing three-dimensional detailed pattern geometries to storing two-dimensional parameter relationships and scaling factors. By defining patterns through dimensional ratios and mathematical relationships rather than explicit 3D coordinates, the system reduces data storage requirements while maintaining the ability to generate precise stacking patterns for any given case and pallet size combination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20250066145A1Palletizer system with centralized palletizing patterns
Publication Date: 2025.02.27 BASTIAN SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US20250066145A1 patent drawing
  • US20250066145A1 patent drawing
  • US20250066145A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A palletizing system includes one or more palletizers. A database is configured to maintain a stacking pattern library containing multiple stacking patterns for the palletizers. A computer is operatively connected to the database. The computer is configured to automatically select a stacking pattern for a selected one of the palletizers. In other words, the computer is configured to change the stacking pattern of one of the palletizers without changing the other palletizers. The database is configured to maintain unique palletizer identifiers used for identifying individual palletizers to promote expandability.