Centralized Printing System for Custom Postage Labels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for printing computer-based value-bearing items, such as postage labels, lack centralized and secure methods for image customization and quality assurance, leading to inefficiencies and potential errors in the printing process.

Innovation Solution

A computer system and method for centralized printing of image-customized computer-based postage labels that involves receiving user-uploaded images, encrypting and decrypting data, and using a secure vault to generate machine-readable postage indicia, with integrated quality assurance processes to ensure compliance with standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If centralized printing system is implemented, then printing efficiency and quality assurance are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A centralized printing system acts as an intermediary between multiple user systems and the printing hardware. The system receives print jobs from multiple users, manages encryption/decryption of value-bearing items, queues jobs systematically, and coordinates with printers. This intermediary structure consolidates complex functions (security, scheduling, quality control) into a single managed system, improving overall printing efficiency while containing complexity in a dedicated infrastructure rather than distributing it across all user systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If image customization is allowed, then user control and versatility are improved, but quality assurance and error prevention become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage customizationVSAvoidquality assurance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized printing system implements feedback mechanisms through systematic quality assurance processes. After receiving customized print jobs with user-uploaded images, the system applies quality checks, validates image parameters, and ensures compliance with postal service standards before processing. This feedback loop allows the system to maintain high versatility in accepting custom images while ensuring reliability through automated validation and error detection, preventing problematic images from proceeding to the printing stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If data encryption is implemented, then security is improved, but processing time and system overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements preliminary action by pre-establishing encryption keys and security protocols before actual printing operations. Value-bearing items are encrypted in advance using predetermined cryptographic algorithms, and decryption keys are prepared beforehand. This preliminary security setup allows the system to maintain high data security while minimizing processing time during actual print job execution, as the computationally intensive encryption/decryption operations are performed in advance rather than in real-time during printing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8805745B1Printing of computer-based value-bearing items
Publication Date: 2014.08.12 AUCTANE INC
  • US8805745B1 patent drawing
  • US8805745B1 patent drawing
  • US8805745B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The exemplary embodiment of the present invention will provide computer systems and methods for printing computer-based value-bearing items such as, for example, an exemplary image-customized computer-based postage label 1 in an exemplary embodiment of the present invention as depicted in FIG. 1. With reference to FIG. 1, the exemplary customized computer-based postage label 1 will bear an image 2 that would be provided by a corresponding user, namely by the user that orders the customized computer-based postage label. The user may provide image 2 in an electronic form, such as by uploading a digital representation of image 2. In a variation of the exemplary embodiment, a user could alternatively provide a hardcopy image. The exemplary customized computer-based postage label 1 will bear a human-readable indication of the country 4 for which the postage is approved. The exemplary customized computer-based postage label 1 will also bear a human-readable indication of an amount of postage 5. The exemplary customized computer-based postage label 1 will also bear a human-readable identifier (such as a serial number) 6 that will uniquely identify the particular customized computer-based postage label. The exemplary customized computer-based postage label 1 will also bear a machine-readable set of information 7.