Centralized Publisher Management System for Content Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current online publishing systems lack efficient methods for managing and evaluating business content across multiple publishers, leading to challenges in content distribution, monitoring, and response to customer reviews, which affects brand perception and customer engagement.

Innovation Solution

A system that identifies suitable publishers based on business categories, translates content for compatibility, monitors published content for issues, and provides recommendations for responses to reviews, enabling centralized management and analysis of content across multiple platforms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If content is manually managed across multiple publishers individually, then each publisher can be customized, but the time and effort required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepublisher customizationVSAvoidcontent management time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple publisher management operations into a single centralized system. The content management platform aggregates publisher selections, content requests, translations, and monitoring into one unified interface, allowing representatives to manage all publishers simultaneously rather than individually, thus reducing time while maintaining customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal content management platform that handles multiple functions across different publishers through a single interface. The platform can request content from representatives, translate content to various formats, distribute to multiple publishers, and monitor performance all through one system, making the process efficient while adapting to each publisher's specific requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If content is translated to formats acceptable to each publisher individually, then compatibility is improved, but the complexity of the process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent format compatibilityVSAvoidtranslation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple translation operations into a single automated process. The content translation component receives content once and automatically translates it to all required publisher formats in parallel, eliminating the need for separate translation steps for each publisher and reducing overall process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The translation system operates autonomously, automatically detecting required formats and translating content without manual intervention. The system self-manages the translation process by comparing publisher requirements with content formats and performing necessary conversions automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If multiple publishers are monitored for content issues individually, then detection accuracy is maintained, but the time required for monitoring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent monitoring accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system combines multiple publisher content checks into a single automated process. The content monitoring component simultaneously tracks all published content across multiple publishers, detecting issues like formatting problems or policy violations in one unified operation rather than sequentially, thus maintaining accuracy while improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Productivity

If a centralized system manages all publishers, then time efficiency is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent distribution efficiencyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized system is segmented into distinct functional components: publisher selection module, content request module, content translation component, and content monitoring component. Each component handles a specific aspect of the process independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining centralized management and high efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10467660B2Centralized publisher management
Publication Date: 2019.11.05 THRYV INC
  • US10467660B2 patent drawing
  • US10467660B2 patent drawing
  • US10467660B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A management system can recommend and manage publishing content with publishers of business information. A representative can provide unique identifying information for a business that can be used to determine a category of similar businesses. Based on the identified category, a list of publishers can be identified to the representative as related to the business category. The representative can select one or more of the publishers to publish content about the business. Based on the representative selection, the system can request a set of content from the representative. After receiving the content from the representative, the system can translate the content to formats acceptable to each of the publishers. The content can then be provided to the publishers to publish. The published content can then be monitored for problems, and corrected if problems are discovered.