Centralized Receipt Generation for Multi-Jurisdictional Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing money transfer services face challenges in generating receipts that comply with diverse regulatory requirements across multiple locations, leading to potential fines and loss of business licenses due to localized generation not accounting for varying regulatory demands.

Innovation Solution

A central server system generates receipts for money transfer transactions, determining the necessary information based on the transaction location to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements at both the origin and destination locations, transmitting these receipts to the appropriate entities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If receipts are generated locally at each location, then each location can quickly produce receipts for transactions, but the receipts may not comply with regulatory requirements of other locations involved in the transaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceipt generation speedVSAvoidregulatory compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the receipt generation function into a centralized server that consolidates regulatory requirements from multiple locations. Instead of each location independently generating receipts, the centralized system combines all relevant regulatory rules and generates compliant receipts for all parties involved in cross-location transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized server acts as an intermediary between multiple locations with different regulatory requirements. It receives transaction information from one location, applies the regulatory rules of both the origin and destination locations, and generates appropriate receipts for each party, thereby mediating the compliance conflict between different jurisdictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple locations each track and implement different regulatory rules, then each location can ensure local compliance, but the system complexity and accountability burden increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal regulatory complianceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized server implements a universal system that handles regulatory compliance for multiple locations through a single platform. It maintains databases of regulatory requirements from various jurisdictions and applies the appropriate rules automatically based on transaction locations, eliminating the need for each location to independently track and implement different rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the complex regulatory compliance logic from individual locations and centralizes it in a dedicated server. This separates the compliance management function from transaction processing at local points, allowing locations to focus on their primary functions while the centralized system handles the complexity of multi-jurisdictional regulatory requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If a centralized server generates receipts for all locations, then regulatory compliance across multiple locations is improved, but the complexity of managing multiple regulatory requirements increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-location regulatory complianceVSAvoidregulatory management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized server performs preliminary actions by pre-loading and storing regulatory requirements from multiple locations into its database before transactions occur. When a transaction is initiated, the system automatically retrieves and applies the relevant regulatory rules based on the origin and destination locations, eliminating the need for real-time regulatory analysis during transaction processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages regulatory complexity by parameterizing regulatory requirements into structured data formats with clear identifiers and rules. It dynamically selects and applies appropriate regulatory parameters based on transaction locations, transforming the complex qualitative task of regulatory compliance into a manageable quantitative process of parameter selection and application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10733590B2Receipt generation service
Publication Date: 2020.08.04 MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US10733590B2 patent drawing
  • US10733590B2 patent drawing
  • US10733590B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes receiving, by a server via a network, transaction information descriptive of a money transfer transaction initiated at a point of entry device. The transaction information includes information that identifies a location of the point of entry device. The method includes determining, by the server, receipt information to be included in a receipt for the money transfer transaction. The receipt information may be determined based, at least in part, on the transaction information, and at least a portion of the receipt information included in the receipt satisfies regulatory requirements associated with the location of the point of entry device. The method includes generating, by the server, the receipt that includes the receipt information, and transmitting the receipt from the server to the point of entry device via the network.