Centralized Study Selection Platform for Engineering Project Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Identifying and performing appropriate studies for engineering projects is challenging due to complex requirements, competing constraints, and uncertain operating environments, leading to subjectivity, time consumption, and potential errors in traditional methods.

Innovation Solution

A centralized platform that gathers project data, automatically selects applicable studies, builds models, and generates reports, enabling efficient and objective study selection and execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional manual methods are used to identify and perform studies for engineering projects, then flexibility in handling complex requirements is maintained, but subjectivity, time consumption, and potential errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of study selectionVSAvoidtime consumption for study identification
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes of study identification with an automated computer-based system that uses algorithms to automatically identify, select, and execute studies based on project data, eliminating human subjectivity and time consumption while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically performing study identification and execution without requiring manual intervention, allowing the computer system to autonomously process project data, select appropriate studies, and generate results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If comprehensive testing processes are implemented to verify system performance and reliability, then safety and compliance are improved, but resource consumption and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem safety and complianceVSAvoidtesting process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the comprehensive testing process into distinct automated components: data extraction from project documents, automatic study identification based on extracted data, model selection and execution, and result generation. This segmentation reduces overall complexity while maintaining thoroughness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal automated platform that can handle multiple types of engineering projects and studies through a single integrated system, reducing the need for separate complex testing processes for different project types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If automated systems are used to identify and execute studies, then objectivity and efficiency are improved, but system complexity and initial resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestudy execution efficiencyVSAvoidautomated system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary automated system that acts as a mediator between project data and study execution, using natural language processing and algorithmic matching to bridge the gap between unstructured project requirements and structured study protocols, simplifying the automation process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260065227A1Method and system for centralized data management and testing
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 FASTGRID LLC
  • US20260065227A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065227A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065227A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method may include obtaining project information or data associated with a project. One or more variables associated with the project may be identified based on the project information. One or more studies applicable to the project may be selected based on the one or more variables. One or more models associated with the one or more studies may be run using the one or more variables. In some embodiments, a report including results of each study of the one or more studies based on the results of running the one or more models may be generated.