Centralized Traffic Control for Emergency Vehicle Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Emergency vehicles face challenges in navigating through congested traffic, leading to slow response times due to factors like gridlock, poor routing, and interference from multiple vehicles, which can hinder their ability to reach emergency scenes quickly.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system that determines the best route for emergency vehicles based on real-time traffic conditions and road availability, using a central command system to initiate traffic control actions along the route, such as adjusting traffic signals and signs, to clear a path for the vehicle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If emergency vehicles use traditional methods (sirens) to clear traffic, then some traffic attention is gained, but effectiveness is insufficient especially in heavy traffic or gridlock conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidtraffic clearing effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating and pre-positioning traffic control measures along the emergency vehicle's route before the vehicle arrives. Traffic signals are adjusted in advance, and alternate routes are prepared, ensuring that when the emergency vehicle approaches, the path is already optimized for rapid passage without requiring reactive siren-based traffic clearing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops by monitoring real-time traffic conditions, emergency vehicle position, and route progress. This feedback enables dynamic adjustment of traffic signal timing and route recommendations, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions and maintain effective traffic clearing throughout the emergency vehicle's journey, rather than relying on static or reactive measures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple emergency vehicles operate simultaneously in the same area, then comprehensive emergency coverage is achieved, but traffic interference and route conflicts increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency response coverageVSAvoidtraffic coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the emergency response system into individually controllable units, where each emergency vehicle receives its own optimized route and traffic control plan. The central system divides the overall emergency response task into separate route segments and coordinates traffic signals independently for each vehicle, allowing multiple vehicles to operate simultaneously without complex inter-vehicle coordination challenges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized traffic control system serves multiple emergency vehicles simultaneously through a universal platform that handles route calculation, traffic signal coordination, and real-time monitoring for all vehicles. This multi-functional system eliminates the need for separate coordination mechanisms for each vehicle, reducing overall complexity while maintaining comprehensive emergency coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If real-time traffic data is collected and processed for route optimization, then route efficiency is improved, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute optimization efficiencyVSAvoidcentral system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a centralized traffic control system as an intermediary between traffic data sources and emergency vehicle navigation. This intermediary consolidates data collection, processing, and route optimization functions in a single location, simplifying the architecture compared to distributed systems where each vehicle would independently process traffic data. The intermediary manages complexity centrally while providing simplified interfaces to individual vehicles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10078965B2Building smart traffic control
Publication Date: 2018.09.18 QUARTZ AUTO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US10078965B2 patent drawing
  • US10078965B2 patent drawing
  • US10078965B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method and system for vehicular traffic control and vehicle routing includes receiving a request for a best route, at a central system. The request including a current location and a destination from a requesting vehicle. Travel factors from the current location to the destination are determined. The travel factors include road availability, traffic conditions, and real time feedback, using the central system in response to receiving the request. The best route is determined for the requesting vehicle from the current location to the destination based on the travel factors, and real time feedback of the traffic conditions. The method and system includes initiating a plurality of traffic control actions along the route for the requesting vehicle. The traffic control actions are initiated along the route simultaneously and in concert with the requesting vehicle to clear the best route for the requesting vehicle to travel unobstructed to the destination.