Centralized Update Testing for Global Network Consistency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large private networks with proprietary software face challenges in maintaining and correcting errors across a global scale, leading to inconsistent solutions and increased risk of transaction failures due to asynchronous issue recognition and duplicate efforts across different regions.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for promptly testing and evaluating updates and error corrections, storing them in a database for network-wide consistency, and determining the safest and most efficient installation methods, utilizing artificial intelligence to analyze and prioritize necessary updates and solutions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If error corrections and maintenance updates are tested and distributed across a large global private network, then network reliability and consistency are improved, but the complexity of managing asynchronous issue recognition and duplicate efforts across different regions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork consistencyVSAvoidupdate management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges distributed update management across multiple regions into a centralized coordination system. A central server collects error reports from all nodes, consolidates unique errors, and distributes coordinated fixes network-wide, preventing duplicate efforts and ensuring consistent application of corrections across all regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where error corrections are tested in a test environment, evaluated for safety and efficiency, and then distributed to production nodes. The system continuously monitors for new errors and automatically initiates new correction cycles, creating a closed-loop feedback system that maintains network reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If updates are tested thoroughly before installation, then transaction failure risk is reduced, but the time required to deploy error corrections increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction success rateVSAvoidupdate deployment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary testing and evaluation of error corrections in a dedicated test environment before deploying to production. The system evaluates multiple candidate fixes, selects the safest and most efficient solution, and pre-validates it against the specific node's configuration and data, reducing risk while streamlining subsequent deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the state of updates by maintaining different versions for testing and production. Corrections are first developed and tested in a test environment with modified parameters, then selectively applied to production nodes based on evaluated safety and efficiency metrics, allowing thorough testing without delaying critical production fixes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If a centralized system coordinates error corrections across all nodes, then solution consistency is improved, but the system complexity and communication overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution consistencyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal centralized server that performs multiple functions: collecting error reports from all nodes, analyzing and prioritizing errors, generating and testing corrections, evaluating candidate fixes, and distributing updates. This multi-functional approach consolidates complexity into a single coordinating system while maintaining solution consistency across the network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If the system evaluates and selects the safest and most efficient update installation method, then update safety is improved, but the processing time and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate safetyVSAvoidcomputational resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial evaluation by assessing multiple candidate corrections to a specific error and selecting only the safest and most efficient option for deployment. Rather than exhaustively testing all possible fixes, the system performs sufficient evaluation to identify the optimal solution, balancing thoroughness with computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11119904B2Computer update and error correction
Publication Date: 2021.09.14 VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION
  • US11119904B2 patent drawing
  • US11119904B2 patent drawing
  • US11119904B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The system and methods may promptly test updates and error corrections in private networks before they are installed. Further, the updates and errors corrections may be stored in a database and may be available to others on the private network. In addition, the updates and errors may be evaluated in an online environment to determine a safe and efficient manner to install the updates and error corrections. The system and methods may also review additional computers and determine necessary updates, error corrections and the safest and most efficient manner to install the updates.