Centrally Assisted Local Manager Selection in P2P Wireless Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In peer to peer wireless networks, the selection of local managers by user equipment (UEs) is often sub-optimal due to limited criteria such as signal strength, lack of centralized control, and dynamic updates, leading to inefficient associations.

Innovation Solution

A centrally assisted mechanism that allows UEs to select local managers based on association parameters, including network metrics and cost metrics, with the network device providing criteria and feedback to improve the selection process, enabling better resource management and connectivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If UEs select local managers based on limited local criteria (signal strength only), then the workload of UEs is reduced and the system is simpler, but the selection quality becomes sub-optimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection mechanism complexityVSAvoidlocal manager selection quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an association parameter as an intermediary element that mediates between the simple signal strength measurement and the complex selection decision. This association parameter, provided by the network device, encapsulates multiple factors (signal strength, load, priority, cost metrics) into a single guidance value that UEs can use for selection without needing to process complex multi-factor decisions themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where network devices provide association parameters to UEs based on network state information, and UEs report their selections and measurements back to the network. This closed-loop feedback enables the network to optimize association parameters dynamically, improving selection quality without increasing UE complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If centralized control is introduced to improve selection quality, then selection optimization improves, but system overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal manager selection qualityVSAvoidsystem overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial centralized control by having network devices provide association parameters only when needed for selection decisions, rather than continuous full control. The network provides guidance parameters selectively based on network conditions, achieving optimization only where necessary while minimizing overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the form of information exchange by using compact association parameters (such as cost metrics or priority values) instead of exchanging detailed multi-factor state information. This parameter transformation reduces overhead while preserving the essential information needed for optimized selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If dynamic updates and multiple metrics are analyzed for selection, then selection quality improves, but UE workload increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal manager selection qualityVSAvoidUE processing workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex multi-metric analysis function from the UE and relocates it to the network device. The network device performs the computationally intensive task of analyzing multiple metrics (signal strength, load, priority, cost) and extracts only the essential association parameter needed by the UE for decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by having the network device pre-calculate and provide association parameters to UEs before the UEs need to make selection decisions. This preliminary processing by the network eliminates the need for UEs to perform complex real-time analysis during selection events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11330401B2Centrally assisted associations with a local manager by peers in a peer to peer wireless network
Publication Date: 2022.05.10 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US11330401B2 patent drawing
  • US11330401B2 patent drawing
  • US11330401B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The technologies described herein are generally directed toward facilitating centrally assisted associations with a local manager by peers in a peer to peer wireless system. According to an embodiment, a system can comprise a processor and a memory that can store executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, facilitate performance of operations. The operations can include identifying a group of local managers of a group of user equipments. The operations can further include receiving, from a network device, a criterion for selecting a local manager from the group of local managers of the group of user equipments, wherein the criterion is based on an association parameter selected by the network device.