One-shot Centre-filled Chocolate Deposition Process

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for producing centre-filled chocolate products are inefficient, requiring multiple steps and being limited in producing smaller products due to the need for moulds, which restricts flexibility and increases costs.

Innovation Solution

A one-shot process where chocolate shell and centre-fill materials are co-deposited onto a planar surface, with controlled temperature and density matching, and subjected to vibration before cooling, allowing for the production of varied shapes and sizes without the need for moulds, using a nozzle arrangement with concentric nozzles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional shell moulding is used to produce centre-filled chocolate products, then the products can be manufactured with hollow shells and fillings, but the process requires multiple steps and is time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the shell deposition and filling operations into a single simultaneous deposition step. The concentric nozzles allow chocolate shell material and centre-fill material to be deposited together in one action, eliminating the separate steps of shell preparation, inversion, and filling required in traditional shell moulding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The deposition system is segmented into concentric nozzles with separate channels for shell material and centre-fill material. This segmentation allows independent control of each material stream while achieving simultaneous deposition, simplifying the overall process compared to traditional multi-step methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If moulds are used to confine the precursor during deposition, then the product shape is controlled, but the apparatus cannot easily produce products of different sizes and shapes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct size and shape variabilityVSAvoidapparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The planar surface serves as a universal deposition substrate that can accommodate precursors of various sizes and shapes. The same apparatus configuration can produce different product variations by simply changing the deposition pattern or surface template, eliminating the need for multiple specialised moulds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of confining the precursor within mould walls during deposition, the patent inverts the approach by depositing the precursor onto a planar surface where it spreads freely. The product shape is defined by the deposition process and surface characteristics rather than mould constraints, enabling greater flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Manufacturing precision

If the precursor is vibrated before cooling, then the surface area increases and product consistency improves, but the centre-fill material may leak

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct uniformityVSAvoidcentre-fill leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent carefully controls the vibration parameters (amplitude, frequency, duration) to achieve sufficient precursor spreading and surface area increase while remaining below the threshold that would cause centre-fill leakage. This optimised parameter selection resolves the contradiction between improving uniformity and preventing leakage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The centre-fill material formulation is locally optimised with specific viscosity and density characteristics that match the shell material. This local property adjustment ensures the centre-fill remains stable during vibration while still allowing precursor spreading, preventing leakage while maintaining product consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Stability of the object's composition

If the centre-fill material density differs significantly from the chocolate shell material density, then the materials can be distinguished, but the centre-fill may settle or separate during deposition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial composition stabilityVSAvoiddeposition uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimises the density difference between centre-fill and shell materials to fall within a specific range (±15%). This parameter control ensures sufficient material distinction for identification while preventing excessive density-driven separation or settling during the simultaneous deposition process, maintaining both composition stability and deposition uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process simplifies the production of centre-filled chocolate products, reduces costs by eliminating the need for moulds, and enables the creation of uniform, consistent products of different sizes and shapes, while preventing leakage through the use of additives like microcrystalline cellulose and carrageenan.

Implementation Method 1

the precursor is subject to vibration before cooling. The vibration causes the precursor to spread out on the substantially planar surface and thereby increase its surface area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

the precursor is cooled to set the chocolate shell material and form the centre-filled chocolate product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentEP2348874B1Process for the preparation of centre-filled chocolate products
Publication Date: 2017.10.11 MONDELEZ UK HLDG & SERVICES LTD
  • EP2348874B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

A process for the preparation of centre-filled chocolate products and one-shot deposited centre-filled chocolate products. In particular, a one-shot process for the preparation of a centre-filled chocolate product (10; 20) comprising a chocolate shell (12; 22) and a centre-fill (14), wherein a chocolate shell material and a centre-fill material are at least partially co- deposited at respective deposition temperatures onto a substantially planar surface to form a precursor; and the precursor is cooled to set the chocolate shell material and form the centre-filled chocolate product, wherein the precursor is subject to vibration before cooling. The centre-filled chocolate products may be generally disc-shaped and/or may have a mass of less than 3.5g. The centre- fill material may comprise microcrystalline cellulose, invert sugar or carageenan.