Centrifugal Chiller Layout for Low-Pressure Refrigerant Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Centrifugal chillers using low-pressure refrigerants face issues with heat loss and poor controllability due to heat exchange between components with different temperature levels, and insufficient pressure differences, especially in low load areas, when integrating vessel walls for compactness.

Innovation Solution

The integration of the condenser and economizer with shared vessel walls, along with strategically positioned base surfaces and the use of expansion valves in refrigerant piping outside the devices, allows for reduced heat loss, stable refrigerant flow, and improved controllability by avoiding direct heat exchange between the condenser and evaporator and securing elevation differences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the condenser, economizer, and evaporator are integrated via shared walls to make the chiller more compact, then the device size is reduced, but heat loss occurs due to heat exchange between the condenser and evaporator which have extremely different temperature levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechiller sizeVSAvoidheat loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the refrigerant flow paths within the integrated vessel by providing partition walls that separate the condenser, economizer, and evaporator sections. This segmentation prevents direct heat exchange between components with different temperature levels while maintaining the compact integrated structure, thus reducing heat loss without sacrificing space efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The economizer acts as an intermediary component positioned between the condenser and evaporator. By routing refrigerant through the economizer with controlled flow paths and using it as a thermal buffer zone, the patent prevents direct thermal coupling between the high-temperature condenser and low-temperature evaporator, thereby reducing parasitic heat loss while maintaining system integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If a fixed orifice is provided inside the economizer as a decompression mechanism, then the device structure is simplified, but controllability deteriorates particularly in low load areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecompression mechanism structureVSAvoidrefrigerant flow controllability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the fixed orifice with a dynamic expansion valve that can adjust its opening degree based on operating conditions. This dynamic component allows the system to maintain optimal refrigerant flow control across varying load conditions, particularly improving performance in low load areas where a fixed orifice would be insufficient, while adding only moderate structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the refrigerant is a low-pressure refrigerant, then environmental impact is reduced, but a pressure difference cannot be sufficiently secured in low compression area, causing deterioration in refrigerant flow and refrigeration capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental impactVSAvoidrefrigerant flow stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces gravitational potential energy as an additional dimension to drive refrigerant flow. By positioning the economizer at a lower elevation than the condenser and the evaporator at a lower elevation than the economizer, the system creates elevation differences that generate hydrostatic pressure head. This gravitational assistance compensates for the insufficient pressure difference in low-pressure refrigerant systems, ensuring reliable refrigerant flow and maintaining refrigeration capability without compromising environmental benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances the compactness of the centrifugal chiller, reduces heat loss, stabilizes expansion valve control, and ensures reliable refrigerant flow across varying operating conditions, even under low pressure differences.

Implementation Method 1

heat exchange between the condenser and the evaporator, and also, a fixed orifice functioning as a decompression mechanism is provided inside the economizer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

a base surface of the economizer is positioned below a base surface of the condenser, and above a base surface of the evaporator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS10254014B2Centrifugal chiller
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND THERMAL SYST
  • US10254014B2 patent drawing
  • US10254014B2 patent drawing
  • US10254014B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A centrifugal chiller in which a closed-cycle refrigeration cycle is formed by connecting a compressor, a condenser, an economizer and decompression means forming a multi-stage compression cycle, and an evaporator, with the refrigeration cycle being charged with a low-pressure refrigerant. The condenser and the economizer are integrated with each other by having a portion of their vessel walls form a shared wall, with the base surface of the economizer being positioned below the base surface of the condenser and above the base surface of the evaporator.