Centrifugal Spreader Border Pattern for Headland Fertilizer Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Areas with under-fertilization often occur, particularly in the headlands connecting to boundary tramlines, leading to reduced yields due to uneven fertilizer distribution.

Innovation Solution

A method using a centrifugal spreader with a border spreading pattern that differs from the normal pattern by distorting the scattering flank in a trapezoidal manner for the inner border spreading edge, allowing for increased fertilizer distribution within the boundary tramline without affecting the outer edge, and adjusting the spread quantity and disc settings based on GPS data for precise application.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a normal spread pattern is used during headland driving, then the spreading mechanism is simple, but under-fertilization occurs in the overlapping area of headland and border tramline

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespreading mechanism simplicityVSAvoidfertilizer distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the spread pattern adjustable based on operating conditions. The control unit dynamically switches between normal spread pattern for field tramlines and border spread pattern for headland driving, optimizing fertilizer distribution for each specific scenario and eliminating under-fertilization in overlapping areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by creating a specialized border spread pattern with an asymmetric scattering flank tailored for headland conditions. This local adaptation ensures that the inner border scattering flank directs fertilizer appropriately toward the field interior in the overlapping area, while the outer border scattering flank prevents over-spreading beyond field boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of substance

If an asymmetric border spread pattern is used to prevent fertilizer loss at field boundaries, then fertilizer conservation is improved, but under-fertilization occurs in the headland overlapping area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefertilizer loss preventionVSAvoidfertilizer distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the border spread pattern into two distinct scattering flanks: an inner border scattering flank facing the field interior and an outer border scattering flank facing the field boundary. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each flank's function - the inner flank ensures sufficient fertilizer supply in the overlapping area while the outer flank prevents fertilizer loss beyond boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by creating a specialized border spread pattern with an asymmetric scattering flank tailored for headland conditions. This local adaptation ensures that the inner border scattering flank directs fertilizer appropriately toward the field interior in the overlapping area, while the outer border scattering flank prevents over-spreading beyond field boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Quantity of substance

If the spread quantity is increased to cover headland areas, then fertilizer coverage is improved, but over-spreading occurs beyond field boundaries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefertilizer coverageVSAvoidover-spreading beyond boundaries
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by creating a specialized border spread pattern with an asymmetric scattering flank tailored for headland conditions. This local adaptation ensures that the inner border scattering flank directs fertilizer appropriately toward the field interior in the overlapping area, while the outer border scattering flank prevents over-spreading beyond field boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies asymmetry by designing a border spread pattern where the inner and outer border scattering flanks have different characteristics. The asymmetric design allows the pattern to extend further toward the field interior where needed while maintaining a controlled edge at the field boundary, preventing fertilizer loss without compromising coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures even fertilizer distribution across the headlands, reducing or eliminating under-fertilization and maintaining an even application within the field boundaries, thereby optimizing yield.

Implementation Method 1

centrifugal spreader with a border spreading pattern

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentEP3165067B1Method for distributing fertilizer with a centrifugal spreader
Publication Date: 2018.06.20 AMAZONEN WERKE H DREYER GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3165067B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3165067B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3165067B1 patent drawingFigure 3a

AI summary

A method for applying fertilizer with a centrifugal spreader (1) is described, wherein, during normal operation in field tramlines (3) in the field interior (2a), a standard spreading pattern (21) of a predetermined working width (AB) is used, and wherein a boundary pass (4) along a headland (5) is also performed. According to the invention, during the boundary pass, a boundary spreading pattern (22) is used, which differs from the standard spreading pattern with respect to the lateral distribution of the fertilizer in an inner boundary spreading flank (22a) facing the field interior. In conjunction with driving along the headland (5), a particularly uniform fertilizer distribution can be achieved and local under-fertilization can be avoided.