Centrifuge Solids Removal Control via Drum Speed Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Self-emptying separators face inefficiencies in solids emptying control, leading to product loss due to non-optimal emptying frequencies and difficulties in measuring parameters for optimal operation, especially when turbidity cannot be effectively used as a control parameter.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a rotatable drum with continuous liquid phase outlet and discontinuous solids outlet, using sensors to monitor drum speed and calculate the actual volume of solids discharged, comparing it to a target volume to adjust emptying intervals, and triggering warnings or control measures for optimal solids management and process analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If solids emptying is triggered by a fixed time interval or constant volume setting, then the control system is simple to operate, but product loss increases when solids content in the inlet varies significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidproduct loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses drum speed as a feedback parameter to monitor solids accumulation in real-time. The speed drop during rotation reflects the solids load, allowing the control system to adaptively adjust emptying timing based on actual solids content in the inlet stream, thereby preventing both product loss and unnecessary emptying operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The emptying interval is transformed from a fixed static parameter to a dynamic parameter that automatically adjusts according to the measured drum speed characteristics. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize the balance between operational simplicity and product loss prevention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If mass balances and solids balances are calculated mathematically to determine optimal emptying time, then emptying precision is improved, but measurement complexity and system difficulty increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemptying timing precisionVSAvoidmeasurement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

Complex mathematical mass balance calculations are replaced by a simpler mechanical measurement approach using drum speed monitoring. The physical parameter of drum speed naturally reflects solids accumulation without requiring complex sensors or computational models, achieving precise emptying timing through straightforward mechanical observation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the measurement parameter from complex multi-parameter mass balance calculations to a single readily available parameter - drum speed. This parameter substitution simplifies the measurement system while maintaining the ability to determine optimal emptying timing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If solids emptying frequency is increased to handle higher solids content in inlet, then solids removal effectiveness is improved, but product loss increases due to emptying clear phase along with solids

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolids removal effectivenessVSAvoidclear phase loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The drum speed provides continuous feedback on the actual solids load, allowing the system to increase emptying frequency only when solids accumulation reaches levels that would compromise removal effectiveness. This prevents premature or excessive emptying that would otherwise cause clear phase loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces product losses by optimizing solids emptying, allowing for better control and analysis of the separator's condition, even when turbidity is not measurable, and identifies potential disruptions or blockages, ensuring homogeneous end products.

Implementation Method 1

separating a liquid phase - called clear phase - from a flowable starting product containing turbidity in a centrifugal field in a rotatable drum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal separation: Centrifugal Separation

Implementation Method 2

sensing the speed of rotation of the drum during the solids discharge of step 100 and determining a drop in speed during the solids discharge of step 100

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMoment of inertia: Moment of Inertia

Data Source

PatentEP3600680B1Method for the automated removal of solids from centrifuges
Publication Date: 2021.05.05 GEA MECHANICAL EQUIP GMBH
  • EP3600680B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3600680B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP3600680B1 patent drawingFigure 3a

AI summary

The invention relates to a method, by means of a which a flowable starting product (AP) is clarified of solids by means of a self-emptying separator in continuous operation in a centrifugal field in the rotating drum (1), wherein at least one clarified liquid phase - a clear phase (KP) - is continuously discharged and wherein solid removals occur by means of the solid outlet openings (5), which should be opened and closed discontinuously. Said method is characterized by optimized monitoring and/or control of the solid removals, wherein a volume balance and a mass balance of the solid removals are created and evaluated.