CeO2 Nanoparticle Catalyst for Methionine Hydrolysis Yield

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing methionine using 2-amino-4-(methylthio)butanenitrile and/or 2-amino-4-(methylthio)butaneamide as starting materials suffer from inconsistent and unsatisfactory yields, with catalyst systems not optimally performing due to variations in catalyst type, amount, and process conditions.

Innovation Solution

A catalyst comprising CeO2 particles with specific surface area and Feret diameter ranges is used for the hydrolysis of 2-amino-4-(methylthio)butanenitrile and/or 2-amino-4-(methylthio)butaneamide, optimizing conversion rates and selectivities to achieve high methionine yields.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional catalyst systems are used for hydrolysis of 2-amino-4-(methylthio)butanenitrile, then the process can proceed, but the methionine yields are inconsistent and unsatisfactory

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemethionine yieldVSAvoidyield consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the CeO2 particle characteristics (surface area: 175-300 m2/g, mean maximum Feret diameter: 3-40 nm, mean minimum Feret diameter: 2-30 nm) to optimize the catalytic hydrolysis process. This systematic parameter optimization resolves the contradiction by achieving both high productivity (95% yield) and reliability (consistent results across different conditions).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses cerium oxide (CeO2) as a specialized catalytic material with specific nanoscale properties. This composite material approach, where the catalyst has precisely controlled surface area and particle size distribution, enables simultaneous achievement of high conversion rates and consistent methionine yields, resolving the productivity-reliability contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Quantity of substance

If CeO2 content is reduced in the catalyst system, then cost may be reduced, but yield consistency typically deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCeO2 contentVSAvoidyield consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent demonstrates that by changing the particle size parameters (mean maximum Feret diameter: 3-40 nm, mean minimum Feret diameter: 2-30 nm) and surface area (175-300 m2/g) of CeO2, high yield consistency (95% methionine yield) can be achieved even with reduced CeO2 content. The nanoscale particle control compensates for lower catalyst quantity, maintaining reliability while reducing material consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If different catalyst types and amounts are used, then process flexibility increases, but performance optimization becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst selection flexibilityVSAvoidmethionine formation rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes specific parameter ranges for CeO2 (surface area: 175-300 m2/g, mean maximum Feret diameter: 3-40 nm, mean minimum Feret diameter: 2-30 nm) that optimize methionine formation. This parameter standardization maintains process flexibility in catalyst selection while ensuring consistent high productivity, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and performance optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves methionine yields of up to 95% with high selectivity, even when using reduced CeO2 content, and maintains consistency across different catalyst compositions and conditions.

Implementation Method 1

contacting a solution or suspension comprising 2-amino-4-(methylthio)butanenitrile and/or 2-amino-4-(methylthio)butaneamide with water in the presence of a catalyst to give a methionine comprising mixture, wherein the catalyst comprises CeO2 comprising particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

the CeO2 comprising particles have a BET surface area of from 175 to 300+/−10% m2/g measured according to DIN ISO 9277-5 (2003), a mean maximum Feret diameter xFmax, mean of from 3+/−10% to 40+/−10% nm and a mean minimum Feret diameter xFmin, mean of from 2+/−10% to 30+/−10% nm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS11897836B2Process for the preparation of methionine
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 EVONIK OPERATIONS GMBH

AI summary

The present invention relates to a process for the preparation of methionine comprising the step of contacting a solution or suspension comprising 2-amino-4-(methylthio)butanenitrile and/or 2-amino-4-(methylthio)butaneamide with water in the presence of a catalyst to give a methionine comprising mixture, wherein the catalyst comprises CeO2 comprising particles, wherein the CeO2 comprising particles have a BET surface area of from 175 to 300+/−10% m2/g measured according to DIN ISO 9277-5 (2003), a mean maximum Feret diameter xFmax, mean of from 3+/−10% to 40+/−10% nm and a mean minimum Feret diameter xFmin, mean of from 2+/−10% to 30+/−10% nm, both measured according to DIN ISO 9276-6 (2012).