Ceramic Core Composition for Reactive Metal Investment Casting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for producing ceramic cores with complex internal channel architectures for turbine blades are limited by reactivity issues with silica-based cores and the inability to create single-piece articles, leading to costly multi-step processes and reduced precision and mechanical stability.

Innovation Solution

A method using an Al2O3-siloxane based slurry with aligned carbon fibers, processed in a two-step firing procedure to convert silicon to amorphous silica and then to mullite, creating a non-reactive, porous, and mechanically strong ceramic core compatible with disposable core die processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If silica-based ceramic cores are used for investment casting, then the cores are easy to remove from the casting and have high-temperature dimensional stability, but the silica reacts with reactive metals during casting causing reactivity issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of core removalVSAvoidreactivity with metal
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite ceramic core material consisting of alumina particles (5-44 mesh size) suspended in a siloxane binder system. The alumina provides chemical inertness with reactive metals while the siloxane binder enables proper slurry formulation and green strength. This composite approach allows the core to resist reaction with reactive metal alloys during casting while maintaining manufacturability and removableness after casting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters of the ceramic core material from traditional silica-based to alumina-based. By adjusting the particle size distribution (5-44 mesh) and using specific siloxane binder ratios, the core achieves optimal properties: chemical compatibility with reactive metals, adequate green strength for handling, and controlled porosity for metal penetration and core removal. The binder-to-powder ratio and firing conditions are also optimized to achieve the desired balance between strength and removability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional injection molding is used to produce ceramic cores, then the manufacturing process is simple, but complex internal channel architectures cannot be produced as single-piece articles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidcomplex geometry capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex internal channel architecture into multiple moldable sections that can be independently formed using conventional injection molding techniques. Each section is designed with its own parting line and ejection system, allowing separate manufacturing. The sections are then precisely assembled using registration features and mechanical joining methods to form the complete complex geometry. This segmentation approach enables production of intricate turbine blade cooling channels that would be impossible to mold as a single piece while maintaining the simplicity of conventional molding processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs nested molding techniques where smaller complex internal channels are formed within larger structural sections. The slurry is injected in a staged manner, with inner complex geometries formed first, followed by outer structural sections. This nested approach allows multiple levels of complexity to be incorporated while using standard injection molding equipment, as each nested section can be molded independently and then assembled into the final complex configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Manufacturing precision

If multi-step processes with multiple mold tools are used to produce complex core geometries, then the desired complex channel architectures can be achieved, but the capital cost and manufacturing complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplex geometry capabilityVSAvoidnumber of mold tools
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the complex core geometry into multiple manageable sections, each designed to be molded by a single standard mold tool. The segmentation is optimized so that each section can be independently manufactured using conventional injection molding equipment already available in production facilities. Registration features and joining mechanisms are incorporated to assemble the sections into the final complex geometry. This approach achieves complex channel architectures while avoiding the need for expensive custom multi-piece mold tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent resolves geometric complexity by transitioning from attempting to mold the entire complex geometry in a single three-dimensional operation to a multi-stage process where simpler two-dimensional or partially-three-dimensional sections are molded separately and then assembled in the third dimension. This dimensional decomposition allows standard mold tools to create complex final geometries through assembly rather than requiring complex single-piece molding operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Manufacturing precision

If multi-piece core assemblies are used to produce complex geometries, then the desired channel architectures can be achieved, but the core yield and dimensional tolerances deteriorate due to assembly registration issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplex geometry capabilityVSAvoidcore yield and dimensional tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates preliminary registration features directly into the mold tooling during the molding process itself. Precision locating pins, registration holes, and mechanical interlocks are built into the mold cavities and core sections, ensuring that when sections are assembled, they automatically align to the required dimensional tolerances. This preliminary provision of alignment features during molding, rather than requiring post-molding adjustment, maintains high core yield and dimensional tolerance even for complex multi-section geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the registration and alignment functions with the structural joining features of the multi-piece assembly. Rather than adding separate alignment mechanisms, the registration features are integrated into the core structure itself, such as using the channel walls or support ribs as both structural elements and alignment references. This integration reduces the number of separate features needed and minimizes potential sources of dimensional error while maintaining assembly precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method produces ceramic cores with increased mechanical strength and porosity, enabling the production of intricate internal shapes while maintaining compatibility with reactive metals and alloys, improving core yield and dimensional tolerances.

Implementation Method 1

a second firing step that removes the carbon fibers (201) and converts the amorphous silica and excess Al2O3 to mullite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

a second firing step that removes the carbon fibers (201) and converts the amorphous silica and excess Al2O3 to mullite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentEP3450047B1A method of producing a ceramic core for investment casting
Publication Date: 2021.03.31 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP3450047B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3450047B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3450047B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of producing a ceramic core for investment casting is provided. The method includes injecting a slurry into a disposable die. The slurry includes ceramic particles, a binder, and carbon fibers. The method also includes a first heating to eliminate the disposable die, leaving a cured ceramic core comprising the ceramic particles, binder, and carbon fibers.