Ceramic Core-Shell Mold Fabrication via DLP

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for manufacturing turbine blades and stator vanes face challenges in producing intricate internal geometries and fine detail features due to limitations in printing resolution, leading to inefficiencies in cooling hole formation and increased manufacturing time and expense.

Innovation Solution

The use of Direct Light Processing (DLP) for creating ceramic core-shell molds with high-temperature structural supports during the liquid metal pouring phase, allowing for the production of thin filaments and efficient cooling hole patterns, and incorporating support features like spheres, metal sheets, and external supports to enhance cooling rates and reduce additive material and print time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional investment casting methods are used to manufacture turbine blades with intricate internal cooling passages, then the manufacturing process can produce complex geometries, but the process requires numerous sequential steps including machining dies, molding ceramic cores, wax assembly, dipping in ceramic slurry, drying, dewaxing, casting, and drilling cooling holes, leading to increased manufacturing time and expense

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintricate internal geometriesVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple conventional manufacturing steps into a single integrated process. Specifically, it merges the ceramic core molding, wax assembly, ceramic shell formation, and cooling passage creation into one additive manufacturing process that deposits ceramic material layer-by-layer to directly form the final mold with embedded cooling passages, eliminating the need for separate drilling operations and reducing the total number of process steps from over ten to a unified additive manufacturing operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical subtractive manufacturing methods (drilling, machining) with an additive manufacturing approach. Instead of drilling cooling holes through solid ceramic cores after mold formation, the system uses additive deposition to directly create the cooling passages within the ceramic structure during the molding process itself, substituting mechanical removal of material with additive construction of the desired geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If additive manufacturing is used to create ceramic molds with thin filaments for cooling holes, then printing resolution and fine detail features are improved, but the structural integrity of the ceramic mold during liquid metal pouring may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting resolutionVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the structural properties of different regions within the ceramic mold. The mold contains both thin-walled regions (for achieving fine detail features and cooling passages) and thick-walled regions (for providing structural strength). This spatial variation in wall thickness and material density allows the mold to simultaneously achieve high printing resolution in critical areas while maintaining overall structural integrity to withstand liquid metal pouring temperatures and pressures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material strategies by creating a ceramic mold structure with heterogeneous properties. The additive manufacturing process enables the formation of a composite ceramic structure where different regions have different material densities and thermal properties - with denser, stronger material in load-bearing areas and more porous, thinner material in regions requiring fine detail reproduction. This composite approach allows the mold to satisfy both resolution and strength requirements that would be contradictory in a homogeneous structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of cast components with complex cooling hole patterns and improved thermal management, reducing manufacturing time and material usage while enhancing the precision and efficiency of the casting process.

Implementation Method 1

A direct light processing (DLP) system may then be used to form a ceramic core-shell mold 700/701

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentEP3473350B1Method for fabricating a high temperature engineering stiffness core-shell mold for casting
Publication Date: 2022.12.28 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP3473350B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3473350B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3473350B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for fabricating a ceramic mold is provided. The method includes the steps of contacting a cured portion of a workpiece with a liquid ceramic photopolymer, irradiating a portion of the liquid ceramic photopolymer adjacent to the cured portion through a window contacting the liquid ceramic photopolymer, removing the workpiece from the uncured liquid ceramic photopolymer, and repeating the steps until a ceramic mold is formed. The ceramic mold includes a first opening for creating a cast article and a second opening for receiving a support member.