Ceramic Cutting Insert Chip Control Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ceramic cutting tools face limitations in high-speed machining due to the commercial unavailability of positive rake molded chip control designs, which are believed to cause premature failure of the cutting edge, and existing solutions either increase power and stress or are costly to manufacture.

Innovation Solution

A ceramic cutting insert with a chip forming feature that includes a land surface and sloping walls, allowing for effective chip control while maintaining the strength of the cutting edge, manufactured using a process involving pressing, sintering, and grinding to achieve the desired shape and tolerance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a positive rake molded chip control design is used in ceramic inserts, then chip control performance is improved, but cutting edge strength deteriorates due to lower transverse rupture strength and fracture toughness of ceramic materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip control performanceVSAvoidcutting edge strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The chip control structure is segmented into distinct functional zones: a relief surface zone that reduces chip contact area, and a molded chip breaker zone that provides positive rake chip control. This segmentation allows the cutting edge to maintain strength while the chip control zones provide improved chip management without compromising the overall cutting edge integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different surface treatments and geometries are applied to different zones of the insert. The relief surface has a specific roughness profile (Ra 32-125 microinches) to reduce chip adhesion, while the chip breaker zone has a molded positive rake geometry. This local differentiation optimizes chip control in specific areas without weakening the cutting edge structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If compounds are added to ceramics to increase fracture toughness and transverse rupture strength, then material strength is improved, but fabrication difficulty increases due to higher sintering temperature or hot pressing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture toughness and transverse rupture strengthVSAvoidfabrication difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the chip control structure by introducing a relief surface with specific roughness characteristics and a molded positive rake geometry. This parameter change allows effective chip control to be achieved through geometric design rather than relying solely on material property enhancement, thereby avoiding the need for more complex high-temperature sintering or hot pressing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If higher sintering temperatures are used to achieve full density and maximum strength, then material density and strength are improved, but reaction layer formation increases which reduces surface toughness and requires additional grinding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial density and strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the chip control function from the cutting edge zone and places it in separate molded zones (relief surface and chip breaker) that are formed during the green body stage. This extraction allows the cutting edge to be optimized for strength while the chip control zones are optimized for chip management, eliminating the need for post-sintering grinding of reaction layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If a separate top clamp chip breaker is clamped to the flat top rake face, then chip control is provided, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip control capabilityVSAvoidinsert structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the chip breaker function directly into the insert body by molding the chip control structure as an integral part of the ceramic insert. The positive rake molded chip breaker and relief surface are formed as single integrated features during the forming process, eliminating the need for separate clamp-on chip breakers and reducing both device complexity and manufacturing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

5Ease of operation

If bevel and island structures are provided on the rake face to provide chip control, then some chip control is achieved, but power requirement and cutting edge stress increase leading to reduced cutting edge lifetime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip controlVSAvoidpower required to cut
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The relief surface is formed with a preliminary roughness profile (Ra 32-125 microinches) that reduces chip adhesion and contact area before the chip reaches the cutting edge. This preliminary action of reducing chip-cutter interaction decreases the forces and power required during cutting, while the molded positive rake chip breaker provides chip control without the excessive stresses associated with traditional bevel and island structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides superior chip removal performance, reduces tool pressure and cutting forces, and allows for higher chip loads and deeper cuts, while being economically viable and reducing manufacturing costs.

Implementation Method 1

sintering the blank to produce a body of a cutting insert

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS10195673B2Ceramic cutting insert and method of making same
Publication Date: 2019.02.05 KENNAMETAL INC
  • US10195673B2 patent drawing
  • US10195673B2 patent drawing
  • US10195673B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cutting insert includes a body made of a ceramic material. The body has a first surface, a second surface and at least one flank surface extending between the first surface and the second surface. The first surface includes a chip forming feature extending in a radially outwardly direction to a cutting edge and extending in a radially inwardly direction to an inner edge. The chip forming feature includes a front wall that slopes downward from the cutting edge radially inward toward a rounded bottom surface and a back wall that slopes upward from the rounded bottom surface radially inward to the inner edge. The chip forming feature can include an optional land surface between the cutting edge and the front wall.