Ceramic Electrode Reuse for Regenerating Lithium-Ion Batteries

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The reuse of lithium-ion secondary batteries is hindered by the complexity and high cost of recycling processes, and the limited purpose of battery reuse due to degradation factors in conventional batteries with organic binders and conductive assistants, making it difficult to remove and reutilize used electrodes effectively.

Innovation Solution

A lithium-ion secondary battery with ceramic electrodes, where the electrolytic solution is replaced and the battery elements undergo cleaning and heat treatment, allowing for simple reassembly and regeneration of the battery, supported by a computer-based reuse support system for judging electrode degradation and determining regeneration processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional lithium-ion secondary batteries with organic binders and conductive assistants are reused, then battery performance can be evaluated and reused by distinguishing use purposes according to degradation degree, but the batteries have many degradation factors making it difficult to remove and reuse electrodes directly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery reuse applicabilityVSAvoiddegradation factors
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the organic binder and conductive assistant components from the electrode structure. By taking out these problematic components that cause degradation, the remaining active material layer can be directly reused without complex recycling processes, thus reducing degradation factors while maintaining battery reuse applicability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameters of the electrode by replacing organic binders with inorganic binder materials. This parameter change fundamentally alters the degradation characteristics of the electrode, enabling direct removal and reuse of the electrode structure without suffering from the limitations of organic binder-based electrodes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of substance

If battery recycling is performed to recover materials, then active materials or alloys can be recovered, but complicated processes are required resulting in high cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial recoveryVSAvoidrecycling process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by designing the electrode structure beforehand to be free of organic binders and conductive assistants. This preliminary design decision prevents the formation of degradation-prone components, allowing the electrode to be directly removed and reused without requiring complex recycling processes to recover materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of discarding the entire electrode for complex recycling, the patent enables direct recovery of the active material layer by simply removing it from the battery. The inorganic binder allows the electrode structure to maintain integrity during removal, enabling straightforward recovery without complicated processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional batteries are reused directly, then the process is simpler, but the organic binder and conductive assistant create many degradation factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereuse process simplicityVSAvoidelectrode stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters of the electrode by substituting organic binders with inorganic binder materials. This parameter change maintains the simplicity of the reuse process while fundamentally improving electrode stability by eliminating the degradation-prone organic components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials where inorganic binder materials replace organic binders in the electrode structure. This composite approach combines the structural benefits of binders with the stability of inorganic materials, enabling both simple reuse processes and high electrode reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the efficient and cost-effective reuse of lithium-ion secondary batteries by simplifying the reassembly process and reducing degradation factors, thereby recovering battery performance and extending the battery's lifecycle.

Implementation Method 1

performing cleaning and/or heat treatment of a battery element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heat Treatment

Data Source

PatentUS20240297358A1System for supporting reuse of lithium-ion secondary battery
Publication Date: 2024.09.05 NGK INSULATORS LTD
  • US20240297358A1 patent drawing
  • US20240297358A1 patent drawing
  • US20240297358A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A reuse support system performs an electrode degradation judgment to judge, based on one or a plurality of kinds of first data diagnosed regarding a ceramic electrode removed from a lithium-ion secondary battery having the ceramic electrode, whether or not a degradation degree of the removed ceramic electrode satisfies a condition for enabling regeneration of the ceramic electrode.