3D Printed Ceramic Mirror Fabrication via Mold-Assisted FFF

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for fabricating high-precision mirrors, particularly ceramic and metal mirrors, require costly and time-consuming polishing processes due to insufficient precision in initial substrate formation, making them inefficient for replicating and producing large quantities, especially for complex shapes like aspherical or free-form mirrors.

Innovation Solution

A 3D printing method using a mold with a complementary optical surface, where successive layers of polymer filament loaded with ceramic or metal powder are deposited, followed by debinding and sintering, eliminating the need for extensive polishing by achieving the desired surface quality directly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional sintering and machining methods are used to fabricate mirror substrates, then the substrate can be formed with basic shape, but the surface precision and roughness are insufficient for optical applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface precisionVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The mold is prepared in advance with a precisely engineered surface that is complementary to the desired mirror optical surface. This preliminary preparation of the mold surface allows the mirror substrate to inherit the high precision directly from the mold during the 3D printing process, eliminating the need for subsequent polishing operations and significantly improving both surface precision and production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a mold with a surface that is a negative copy of the desired mirror optical surface. By depositing material directly onto this mold surface through 3D printing, the mirror substrate creates a precise positive copy of the optical surface, achieving the required manufacturing precision without traditional polishing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If polishing operations are performed to achieve the required surface quality, then the optical surface precision is improved, but the production time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface roughnessVSAvoidpolishing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The mold surface is prepared in advance with the precise optical quality required for the mirror. By forming the mirror substrate directly on this pre-prepared mold surface through 3D printing, the surface roughness and precision are achieved during the deposition process itself, eliminating the need for time-consuming polishing operations and significantly reducing production time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical polishing system with a direct deposition system. Instead of using mechanical abrasion to remove material and achieve surface quality, the process uses controlled material deposition onto a precision mold surface, achieving the same or better surface quality without the time and cost of polishing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If classical additive fabrication is used to build mirrors layer by layer, then the mirror can be formed directly, but the surface state does not reach the desired optical quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirect fabrication capabilityVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces a mold with a precisely engineered surface as an intermediary between the 3D printing process and the final mirror substrate. The mold acts as a mediator that transfers its high-precision surface characteristics to the deposited material, enabling the additive fabrication process to produce surfaces with optical quality that would otherwise require extensive post-processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the critical parameter from the surface quality of the deposited material itself to the surface quality of the mold. By controlling the mold surface parameters (roughness, precision, geometry) rather than relying on the deposition process alone, the method achieves optical-quality surfaces through additive fabrication, combining the productivity of 3D printing with the precision of traditional molding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If hard-to-polish materials like silicon carbide and aluminum are used, then high-performance mirrors with excellent mechanical and thermal properties are achieved, but the polishing process becomes extremely costly and difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical and thermal propertiesVSAvoidpolishing difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The mold is prepared in advance with a precisely engineered surface suitable for the specific hard-to-polish material. By depositing the ceramic or metal powder layers directly onto this pre-prepared mold surface through 3D printing, the mirror inherits the mold's surface quality, completely avoiding the need for subsequent polishing operations on the hard, difficult-to-machine material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical polishing system with a direct deposition system for hard-to-polish materials. Instead of using costly diamond machining and polishing equipment to achieve surface quality on materials like silicon carbide and aluminum, the process uses controlled material deposition onto a precision mold, achieving optical surfaces without the extreme difficulty and cost of polishing these hard materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method produces mirrors with the required precision and roughness without the need for polishing, significantly reducing production time and costs, and is suitable for hard-to-polish materials like silicon carbide and aluminum.

Implementation Method 1

construction of said mirrors by 3D printing on a mold arranged on a tray of a 3D printer using a printing technology by deposition of fused material known under the acronym FFF, for Fused Filament Fabrication

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effect3D Printing (Fused Filament Fabrication): 3D Printing

Implementation Method 2

Sintering the ceramic and/or metallic powder in order to solidify the mirror

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS20240286194A1Method for fabricating a mirror by 3D printing
Publication Date: 2024.08.29 SAFRAN REOSC
  • US20240286194A1 patent drawing
  • US20240286194A1 patent drawing
  • US20240286194A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for fabricating mirrors includes a step of constructing the mirrors by 3D printing on a mold arranged on a tray of a 3D printer, using fused filament fabrication (FFF) printing technology. The mold has a free surface matching an optical surface of a mirror to be fabricated. The method includes depositing, in consecutive layers on the mold, a fused polymer filament loaded with a powder of a ceramics. The deposition starts with the optical surface of the mirror on the free surface of the mold. The method further includes a step of disassembling the mirror and the mold; a step of debinding the ceramic powder; and a step of sintering the ceramic powder in order to solidify the mirror.