Ceramic Mold Insert for Rapid Injection Tooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional injection molding tools are costly and time-consuming to produce and modify, limiting the ability to rapidly prototype and produce multiple designs or variations, as they often require new molds for each design change, and existing plastic-based mold inserts are not durable enough to withstand the high pressures and temperatures of the injection molding process.

Innovation Solution

The method involves producing a ceramic mold insert using additive manufacturing and a support block, where a replica of the article is created using rapid prototyping techniques, and a ceramic resin is introduced to form a rigid mold insert that can withstand the injection molding process, allowing for rapid prototyping and production of multiple designs without the need for expensive steel or aluminum tooling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional steel or aluminum molds are used for injection molding, then the molds can withstand high pressures and temperatures, but the tooling costs are high and modification time is long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold durabilityVSAvoidtooling cost and production time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The mold is divided into two distinct parts: a permanent steel support block that provides structural strength and pressure resistance, and a removable ceramic insert that contains the cavity geometry. This segmentation allows the expensive durable component to be reused while the design-specific component can be rapidly manufactured and changed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention combines two different materials with complementary properties: steel (for strength and durability) and ceramic (for thermal resistance and design flexibility). The ceramic insert is housed within the steel support block, creating a composite tooling system that leverages the advantages of both materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If plastic-based mold inserts are used, then the tooling cost is reduced, but the inserts cannot withstand the high pressures and temperatures of injection molding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooling costVSAvoidmold durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention combines two different materials with complementary properties: steel (for strength and durability) and ceramic (for thermal resistance and design flexibility). The ceramic insert is housed within the steel support block, creating a composite tooling system that leverages the advantages of both materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Adaptability or versatility

If a new mold is created for each design change, then the molded article design can be changed, but the retooling time and cost increase considerably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign change capabilityVSAvoidretooling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The mold is divided into two distinct parts: a permanent steel support block that provides structural strength and pressure resistance, and a removable ceramic insert that contains the cavity geometry. This segmentation allows the expensive durable component to be reused while the design-specific component can be rapidly manufactured and changed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The ceramic inserts are pre-manufactured using additive manufacturing technology, which allows rapid production of design variations. These pre-made inserts can be quickly swapped into the support block when design changes are needed, eliminating the need for time-consuming retooling operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple complete molds are fabricated for multiple designs, then various parts and designs can be produced, but the tooling costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-design production capabilityVSAvoidtooling cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The mold is divided into two distinct parts: a permanent steel support block that provides structural strength and pressure resistance, and a removable ceramic insert that contains the cavity geometry. This segmentation allows the expensive durable component to be reused while the design-specific component can be rapidly manufactured and changed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A single universal steel support block can accommodate multiple different ceramic inserts, each representing a different design. This universal base structure allows one mold assembly to perform multiple functions by simply changing the insert, eliminating the need for multiple complete molds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the rapid and cost-effective production of injection molding tools with superior durability and accuracy, allowing for frequent design changes and production of precise parts with improved surface finish and dimensional consistency, reducing tooling costs and production time.

Implementation Method 1

a ceramic resin material is introduced into the spaced distance. The ceramic resin material is allowed to cure and form a ceramic mold insert

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCuring: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS10076868B1Rapid prototyping method of producing tooling for an injection mold
Publication Date: 2018.09.18 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US10076868B1 patent drawing
  • US10076868B1 patent drawing
  • US10076868B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of producing an injection molding tool for molding an article includes producing a replica of the article using at least one of an additive manufacturing process, a solid freeform fabrication process, or a computer numerically controlled (CNC) process. A support block is configured to receive at least a portion of the replica and support the replica with at least one of an outer peripheral surface of the replica or an inner peripheral surface of the replica positioned at a spaced distance from a peripheral surface of the support block. The replica is supported inside the support block at the spaced distance, a ceramic resin material is introduced into the spaced distance and cured to form a ceramic shell insert, the insert is removed from the cavity, and the insert is positioned within the support block to form a part of a mold tool adapted for installation in a standard plastic injection molding machine.