Ceramic-Filled Polymer Composites for Plasma Reactor Components

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current plasma treatment apparatuses face challenges with high costs and brittleness due to the use of ceramic and refractory materials, and existing polymers are not adequately resistant to plasma environments, leading to erosion and contamination issues.

Innovation Solution

Ceramic particle-filled polymers such as polyimides, polyamideimides, and polyetherketones are used to create composite parts that are more resistant to plasma-induced erosion and breakage, eliminating the need for conductive particles and reducing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If ceramic and refractory materials are used for plasma-exposed parts, then chemical resistance and erosion resistance are improved, but cost increases and brittleness increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical resistanceVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses ceramic-filled polymer composite materials that combine the chemical resistance of ceramics with the toughness and ease of processing of polymers. The composite contains ceramic particles dispersed in a polymer matrix, providing both the erosion resistance of ceramics and the ductility of polymers, thereby reducing brittleness while maintaining chemical resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameters by selecting specific polymer matrices (such as PTFE, polypropylene, polyethylene) and optimizing ceramic filler content and particle size distribution. This allows tuning of the composite's properties to achieve adequate chemical resistance while improving toughness and reducing brittleness compared to pure ceramic materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If ceramic and refractory materials are used for plasma-exposed parts, then erosion resistance is improved, but ease of manufacture deteriorates due to machining difficulties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerosion resistanceVSAvoidmachining ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The ceramic-filled polymer composite combines hard ceramic particles for erosion resistance with a polymer matrix that is easier to machine and process. The composite can be manufactured using conventional polymer processing techniques such as injection molding, extrusion, and compression molding, avoiding the difficult machining requirements of pure ceramic materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical machining of pure ceramics with polymer processing techniques for the composite material. The polymer matrix allows for easier forming and shaping operations, reducing the need for complex machining operations while maintaining the erosion resistance provided by the ceramic filler.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional polymers are used in plasma environments, then cost is reduced and ease of manufacture is improved, but erosion resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of processingVSAvoiderosion resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enhances traditional polymers by incorporating ceramic fillers to create composite materials that maintain the ease of processing and cost advantages of polymers while significantly improving erosion resistance. The ceramic particles reinforce the polymer matrix, reducing plasma-induced erosion while preserving the material's processability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the polymer material parameters by adding ceramic fillers and optimizing the composite formulation to achieve adequate erosion resistance while maintaining the low cost and ease of processing characteristics of polymer materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If ceramic-filled polymer composites are used, then toughness and breakage resistance are improved, but electrical conductivity remains non-conductive

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetoughnessVSAvoidelectrical conductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different material properties to different functional requirements: the polymer matrix and ceramic filler combination provides toughness and erosion resistance where needed, while the inherent non-conductive nature of the composite is accepted or supplemented with separate conductive components in specific locations where electrical conductivity is required for plasma generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9640381B2Process for plasma treatment employing ceramic-filled polymer composite parts
Publication Date: 2017.05.02 QUADRANT EPP
  • US9640381B2 patent drawing
  • US9640381B2 patent drawing
  • US9640381B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Internal components of plasma reactors are composed of a toleratable, ceramic filled plasma-useful polymer such as a high temperature engineering thermoplastic, preferably a polyamideimide or polybenzimidazole. The parts exhibit a low erosion rate upon exposure to plasma at low pressure.