Ceramic-Particulate Polyurethane Foam for Impact Energy Absorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Impact absorbing polymeric foams typically only absorb about 15% of the energy from impacts, which is insufficient for effective protection in applications such as football helmets, leading to potential head injuries.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating ceramic particulates with specific size and crushing strength ranges into a polymeric foam to enhance energy absorption, allowing the foam to absorb significantly higher percentages of impact energy, up to 85%, by dispersing them within the polymeric matrix, which includes polyurethane and other polymers, and using various production processes to tailor the foam's properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If conventional polymeric foam is used for impact absorption, then the foam structure provides basic cushioning, but the energy absorption capacity is limited to about 15% of impact energy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorption capacityVSAvoidprotection effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining polymeric foam with ceramic particulates to create a hybrid structure. The ceramic particles (such as alumina, silica, or titania) are dispersed within the polymeric matrix, creating a composite foam that leverages both the cushioning properties of the foam and the energy-absorbing characteristics of the ceramic particles during impact events

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by systematically varying the ceramic particulate properties including particle size (from 1 to 400 microns), crushing strength (from 100 to 2,000,000 psi), concentration (5-50% by volume), and distribution within the foam. These parameter adjustments optimize the energy absorption capacity, enabling the foam to absorb between 20% and 85% of impact energy depending on the specific application requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If ceramic particulates are added to enhance energy absorption, then impact energy absorption increases to 20-85%, but the foam structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorption capacityVSAvoidfoam structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes porous materials by maintaining the foam's inherent porous structure while incorporating ceramic particulates. The foam cells provide a controlled porous architecture that allows the ceramic particles to be distributed throughout the matrix, creating a complex yet functional structure that absorbs energy through both foam cell deformation and ceramic particle crushing mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating regions with varying ceramic particulate concentrations and sizes within the foam matrix. This localized variation in composition allows different areas of the foam to respond differently to impact forces, with higher ceramic concentrations in regions requiring greater energy absorption and lower concentrations in regions requiring flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Use of energy by moving object

If ceramic particulates with specific size and strength ranges are used, then energy absorption reaches 30-85%, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorption capacityVSAvoidparticulate size and distribution control
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial or excessive action by using a broad range of ceramic particulate sizes (1-400 microns) rather than requiring uniform particle dimensions. This size distribution allows smaller particles to fill voids between larger particles, improving packing efficiency and energy absorption while reducing the need for precise size control of individual particles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The ceramic-particulate enhanced foam effectively absorbs a higher percentage of impact energy, reducing the risk of head injuries and providing improved protection in helmets and other applications by effectively cushioning the impact through the crushing of ceramic particulates.

Implementation Method 1

The ceramic particulates have a crushing strength in the range from about 100 to about 2,000,000 pounds per square inch (psi)... effectively cushioning the impact through the crushing of ceramic particulates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFracture Mechanics: Fracture Mechanics

Implementation Method 2

These impact absorbing foams may absorb energy resulting from impact against the helmet during play with the result being a reduction in head injuries... absorb at impact at least about 20%, or at least about 30%, or at least about 40%, or at least about 50%, or at least about 60%, or at least about 75%, or at least about 85% of the energy resulting from such impact

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS9365692B2Impact absorbing foam
Publication Date: 2016.06.14 PROVEE TECH

AI summary

This invention relates to impact absorbing foams. These foams comprise a polymeric foam and ceramic particulates dispersing the foam. These foams have numerous uses, including, for example, as interior pads for football helmets, and the like, for reducing head injuries.