Ceramic Press Structure with Polycentric Cuts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ceramic tile-forming presses have large, complex structures that are inefficient in terms of size and assembly, with high resistance to fatigue and stability issues due to the need for extensive support and modular components, leading to increased production costs and potential deformation under load.

Innovation Solution

A compact, lightweight press structure featuring monolithic annular elements with specific full-thickness cuts and lubricated surfaces, allowing for modular assembly and distribution of load stresses, reducing the overall size and weight while maintaining resistance to fatigue and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If a large free space between uprights is provided to accommodate large pressing rectangles, then the inlet mouth for material is sufficient, but the structure becomes excessively large and tall requiring partial interment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefree space between uprightsVSAvoidstructure height
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reorients the structural support from a vertical configuration (tall uprights) to a horizontal configuration (longitudinal beams along the inlet direction). This dimensional change allows the pressing force to be supported along the length of the press rather than requiring height, thus resolving the contradiction between providing sufficient free space and avoiding excessive structure height

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If thick uprights are used to guarantee undeformability under pressing force, then structural stability is improved, but the structure becomes excessively tall and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to pressing forceVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the structural support into multiple longitudinal beams distributed along the inlet direction, rather than using a single thick upright. Each beam carries a portion of the pressing force, and their collective arrangement provides the necessary structural stability while maintaining a simpler, more compact overall structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure is reconfigured from vertical uprights to horizontal longitudinal beams, changing the dimension in which structural strength is provided. This allows the press to achieve the required resistance to pressing force through the length of the beams rather than through vertical height, simplifying the overall device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a modular structure with multiple resistant elements is used to adapt to loading defects, then flexibility is improved, but the assembly complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to loading defectsVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The press structure is divided into multiple modular pressing units, each with its own resistant elements, arranged in series along the inlet direction. This segmentation allows individual modules to be adjusted or replaced independently to adapt to loading defects, while the modular nature simplifies assembly compared to a monolithic complex structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a press that is simpler to assemble, lighter, and more compact, with improved resistance to fatigue and stability, enabling efficient production with reduced material usage and operational complexity.

Implementation Method 1

lubricated surfaces, allowing for modular assembly and distribution of load stresses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLubrication: Lubrication

Data Source

PatentUS8857327B2Structure for presses, in particular for forming ceramic products
Publication Date: 2014.10.14 SYSTEM CERAMICS SPA
  • US8857327B2 patent drawing
  • US8857327B2 patent drawing
  • US8857327B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A structure for presses, a resistant structure of which includes at least a resistant element which, in turn, includes an annular element or arch, internally of which are predisposed two facing surfaces, between which at least a power organ is insertable, which power organ is suitable for compressing an object or material to be pressed between two bodies. Full-thickness cuts are symmetrically arranged at ends of the facing surfaces, each cut, starting from the end of the relative facing surface, develops over an arc of a polycentric curve which exhibits at least a first tract, the most external surface of which connects with the lateral surface of the vertical portion of the annular element or arch, and at least a second tract which is connected to the first tract and extends over a portion of not less than a quarter of an arc of circumference.