Cerebral Autoregulation Monitoring via Multi-Bin Correlation Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for monitoring cerebral autoregulation struggle with accuracy due to noise in physiological parameter measurements and lack of reliable metrics for determining autoregulation status, leading to potentially inaccurate or unreliable autoregulation status calculations.

Innovation Solution

The use of processing circuitry to determine a composite estimate of the limit of autoregulation by analyzing correlation coefficient values across multiple bins with varying bin parameters, such as width and separation distance, to improve the accuracy of autoregulation status assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If correlation coefficient values are analyzed using single bin parameters, then processing is simplified, but measurement precision and reliability of autoregulation status determination deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing complexityVSAvoidautoregulation status determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the analysis into multiple bins with different parameters (width, separation distance) to segment the correlation coefficient values. Each bin provides a specific perspective on the data, and combining these segmented views through voting or averaging mechanisms improves the overall measurement precision without requiring excessive processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically varies bin parameters (width and separation distance) to create multiple analyses of the correlation coefficient values. By changing these parameters across different bins and aggregating the results, the system achieves higher measurement precision while maintaining manageable processing complexity through structured parameter variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple bins with varying parameters are used to analyze correlation coefficients, then measurement precision and reliability improve, but device complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautoregulation status reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the analysis into multiple bins with different parameters, where each bin independently processes a subset of correlation coefficient values. This segmentation allows parallel processing and distributes computational load, improving reliability through multiple independent analyses while managing overall processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the results from multiple bins with different parameters through voting mechanisms or averaging. This combining step aggregates the reliable information from each bin to produce a final autoregulation status determination, achieving high reliability while the structured merging process keeps processing complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If bin width is reduced to improve measurement precision, then autoregulation status determination accuracy improves, but processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelimit of autoregulation estimation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data into multiple bins with different widths, including some bins with smaller widths for higher precision estimation. By having multiple bins with varying widths, the system can balance processing time and precision, using wider bins for quick estimates and narrower bins for precise measurements where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by not all bins using the same narrow width. Instead, it uses a mix of bin widths where some bins provide sufficient precision without the full computational cost of uniformly narrow bins. This partial application of high-precision processing achieves adequate measurement precision while reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11771376B2Determining changes to autoregulation
Publication Date: 2023.10.03 COVIDIEN LP
  • US11771376B2 patent drawing
  • US11771376B2 patent drawing
  • US11771376B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, a device includes processing circuitry configured to determine a set of correlation coefficient values for first and second physiological parameters. The processing circuitry is further configured to determine a metric of the correlation coefficient values for a first plurality of bins and for a second plurality of bins, wherein each bin of the first plurality has a first bin parameter and each bin of the second plurality of bins has a second bin parameter different than the first bin parameter. The processing circuitry is also configured to determine a composite estimate of a limit of autoregulation of the patient based on the metric for the first plurality of bins and the metric for the second plurality of bins. The processing circuitry is configured to determine an autoregulation status based on the composite estimate and output, for display via the display, an indication of the autoregulation status.