Automated Cerebral Disease Diagnosis via Statistical ROI Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for diagnosing cerebral diseases using brain images, such as MRI, rely on manual ROI selection, leading to subjective results and operational errors, and require extensive human evaluation, which is inefficient and lacks objectivity.

Innovation Solution

A statistical method is employed to determine and apply a disease-specific region of interest (ROI) to brain images, comparing them with pre-prepared normal case images to provide objective diagnosis results, using Z scores and anatomical standardization to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual ROI selection is used for brain images, then flexibility in analysis can be maintained, but subjectivity and operational errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnosis reliabilityVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically selects and applies ROIs based on pre-stored disease-specific anatomical information without requiring manual operator intervention. The computer automatically performs image processing, Z-score calculation, and diagnosis assistance, eliminating subjective human judgment while maintaining operational simplicity through automated workflows

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

ROI definitions and anatomical standardization data are pre-prepared and stored in the system before actual diagnosis. The system uses these pre-established frameworks to automatically analyze new brain images, ensuring consistent and reliable results without requiring manual ROI creation during each diagnosis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If extensive manual processing is performed for image evaluation, then processing thoroughness can be maintained, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual image processing operations with automated computer algorithms. Image processing, Z-score calculations, and statistical comparisons are performed automatically by the computer, achieving high processing accuracy while dramatically reducing the time required compared to manual evaluation methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms qualitative manual evaluation into quantitative automated measurement using Z-scores and statistical parameters. By converting image data into standardized statistical values, the system maintains measurement precision while enabling rapid automated processing without time-consuming manual analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional ROI methods are used, then manual control over analysis regions is maintained, but objectivity of results decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis flexibilityVSAvoiddiagnosis objectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes disease-specific ROI frameworks based on extensive anatomical and statistical data before actual analysis. These pre-defined frameworks ensure objective and reproducible results by eliminating manual ROI creation, while still adapting to different diseases through pre-stored disease-specific anatomical information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses pre-stored standard anatomical models and ROI definitions as templates for analyzing new brain images. By copying and applying these standardized frameworks automatically, the system maintains diagnostic flexibility across different conditions while ensuring objective, reproducible results through consistent application of established criteria

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS8218835B2Method for assisting in diagnosis of cerebral diseases and apparatus thereof
Publication Date: 2012.07.10 DAI NIPPON PRINTING CO LTD
  • US8218835B2 patent drawing
  • US8218835B2 patent drawing
  • US8218835B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Input MRI brain images are positioned so as to correct a spatial deviation, gray matter tissues are extracted from these images to effect a first image smoothing, the thus-obtained images are subjected to anatomical standardization, a second image smoothing is effected, the gray level is corrected, brain images after correction are statistically compared with MRI brain images of normal cases, thereby providing the diagnosis result. In this instance, the brain images are automatically checked for input images regarding the resolution dot density and the like, the result of gray matter tissue extraction and the result of anatomical standardization, by which specifications of input images and the like can be confirmed objectively and automatically to make a diagnosis automatically by image processing. Further, an ROI-based analysis is made to provide the analysis result as the diagnosis result.