Cerebral Network Analysis via Iterative Stimulation Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for brain source localization, such as EEG, face challenges in providing unambiguous solutions due to the ill-posed nature of the inverse problem, and there is a need for improved precision in both localization and stimulation techniques to effectively target and stimulate neural sources.

Innovation Solution

A method that combines initial source localization with electrical stimulation, followed by a second measurement procedure to assess the accuracy of the initial estimates, allowing for iterative refinement of source localization and tractographic analysis, using feedback loops to minimize discrepancies and improve precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If EEG source localization is performed using standard inverse problem methods, then source locations can be estimated, but the solution is insufficiently constrained and ambiguous

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesource localization precisionVSAvoidsolution unambiguity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by using electrical stimulation to activate localized brain regions, then using EEG to measure the resulting electrical fields. These measured fields are fed back to verify and refine the source localization estimates, creating an iterative process that resolves the ambiguity of the inverse problem. The stimulation-EEG loop provides empirical validation that constrains the solution space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary electrical stimulation to activate specific brain regions before conducting the EEG measurement. This preliminary action creates a known, controllable neural response that serves as a reference for validating source localization. By stimulating first, the system establishes a ground truth against which localization accuracy can be assessed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If electrical stimulation is applied to target localized brain sources, then therapeutic or research effects can be produced, but imprecise localization reduces stimulation effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestimulation effectivenessVSAvoidsource location accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback to continuously refine source localization by comparing EEG measurements during/after stimulation with predicted fields from the anatomical model. This iterative verification process improves location accuracy, ensuring that subsequent stimulation is precisely targeted to the intended brain regions, thereby enhancing stimulation effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct mechanical or invasive methods for verifying source location with an electrical field-based verification system. By using EEG to measure electrical fields generated by stimulated neurons and comparing these to model predictions, the system non-invasively validates localization accuracy without requiring physical intervention or additional imaging procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of manufacture

If anatomical models are used to calculate tissue impedances for inverse problem solution, then source localization can be performed, but the models are either subject-specific (requiring MRI) or generalized (less accurate)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel acquisition easeVSAvoidlocalization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback from electrical stimulation-EEG measurements to refine the anatomical model parameters, particularly tissue impedances. By comparing measured electrical fields during stimulation with those predicted by the model, the system iteratively adjusts model parameters to better match actual brain anatomy and tissue properties, improving localization accuracy without requiring high-resolution subject-specific MRI data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the precision of brain source localization and tractography by iteratively refining estimates based on stimulation effects, providing more accurate locations and connectivity assessments, thereby improving the effectiveness of electrical brain stimulation.

Implementation Method 1

The conductive aspect of this electrical activity is responsible for physiological effects in the brain and/or elsewhere in the body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

measuring the surface potentials (voltages) that result from the radiative aspect of the source activity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Radiation

Implementation Method 3

This electrical activity is propagated away from the sources, by conduction to other patches of neurons through a network of 'tracts'

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS10194824B1Method for using electrical stimulation for cerebral network analysis
Publication Date: 2019.02.05 MAGSTIM GRP INC
  • US10194824B1 patent drawing
  • US10194824B1 patent drawing
  • US10194824B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for using electrical stimulation for cerebral network analysis. A first source localization procedure is performed, including a first source measurement procedure which produces first source measurement data, using the first source measurement data to find a solution to a first ill-posed problem which provides a first estimated location of the source. The body is electrically stimulated by targeting the first estimated location, and a second, fast source measurement procedure producing second source measurement data is performed thereafter while measurable effects of the step of stimulating, on the source, still remain. The second source measurement data are compared with the first source measurement data for assessing an extent to which the first estimated location is correct.