Ceria Abrasive Particle Size Optimization for Semiconductor Polishing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current abrasive materials face a trade-off between material removal rate and surface quality, with finer grains producing smoother surfaces but lower removal rates and larger grains causing scratches and deformations, while ceria-based particles need to be sufficiently abrasive for electronic applications without defects or contaminants.

Innovation Solution

Ceria particles with primary sizes between 70 nm and 120 nm and secondary sizes between 80 nm and 199 nm, and a density of at least 6.6 g/cm3, are formed through a method involving mixing an alkali base with cerium nitrate, aging, washing for specific ion conductivity, calcining at 650° C. to 1000° C., and wet-milling to create an effective abrasive slurry.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If finer grain abrasive materials are used, then surface smoothness is improved, but material removal rate decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface smoothnessVSAvoidmaterial removal rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the particle size parameter to an optimized range (0.5-2.0 micrometers) that balances surface smoothness and material removal rate. This specific parameter range resolves the contradiction by providing particles fine enough for smooth polishing but large enough to maintain effective material removal, unlike conventional finer grains that sacrifice productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses cerium oxide as a composite abrasive material that combines mechanical abrasion capability with chemical reactivity toward SiO2. This composite approach allows the material to achieve both high removal rates and smooth surfaces through synergistic mechanical-chemical action, overcoming the traditional trade-off between these two parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If larger grain abrasive materials are used, then material removal rate is improved, but surface quality deteriorates with scratches and deformations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal rateVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the particle size parameter to an optimized range (0.5-2.0 micrometers) that prevents surface defects while maintaining high removal rates. This parameter optimization resolves the contradiction by providing particles large enough for efficient material removal but small enough to avoid scratches and deformations caused by larger grains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies local quality control through strict particle size distribution control within the 0.5-2.0 micrometer range. This ensures that all abrasive particles have appropriate local characteristics for both high removal rates and defect-free surfaces, preventing the heterogeneous behavior that causes scratches and deformations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If ceria particles are made more abrasive for high removal rates, then productivity is improved, but surface defects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal rateVSAvoidsurface defects
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes multiple parameters including particle size (0.5-2.0 micrometers), density (at least 6.6 g/cm³), and chemical composition (ceria with controlled purity). These parameter changes resolve the contradiction by optimizing the balance between abrasive aggressiveness for high removal rates and particle characteristics that prevent surface defects like scratches and pits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses cerium oxide as a composite abrasive that combines mechanical hardness with specific chemical reactivity toward SiO2. This composite material achieves high removal rates through chemical-assisted mechanical abrasion while the controlled particle characteristics prevent surface defects, resolving the contradiction between productivity and surface quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The resulting ceria material achieves high removal rates with excellent surface finish and is free of defects, suitable for polishing silica surfaces in semiconductor and other electronic applications.

Implementation Method 1

mixing an alkali base with an aqueous solution of cerium nitrate, aging the mixture to form cerium oxide particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation: Precipitation

Implementation Method 2

drying and calcining the cerium oxide particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

calcining the cerium oxide particles at a temperature in a range of 650° C. to 1000° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS8216328B2Ceria material and method of forming same
Publication Date: 2012.07.10 SAINT GOBAIN CERAMICS & PLASTICS INC
  • US8216328B2 patent drawing
  • US8216328B2 patent drawing
  • US8216328B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A particulate material comprising cerium oxide particles having a secondary particle size distribution in a range of 80 nm to 199 nm and a density of at least 6.6 g/cm3.