Cermet Insert Through-Hole Structure for Clamp-Induced Crack Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cermet inserts used in machining are prone to abnormal damage, particularly due to high forces applied during attachment to a holder, leading to cracking and reduced durability.

Innovation Solution

A cermet insert with a binder-phase-rich layer on its inner wall, where the thickness of the layer at the center portion is greater than at the end portions, reducing deformation and localized stress when attached to a holder.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a cermet insert is attached to a holder with high forces, then secure attachment is achieved, but abnormal damage and cracking occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment strengthVSAvoidinsert durability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a binder-phase-rich layer specifically at the center portion of the inner wall of the through hole, where the clamp contacts during attachment. This localized region has different mechanical properties (higher binder phase content, greater thickness T1) compared to the end portions, allowing it to absorb attachment forces without causing cracking to the entire insert structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The binder-phase-rich layer acts as a pre-formed cushioning layer that absorbs and distributes the high forces applied during attachment to the holder. The layer's higher binder phase content and greater thickness at the center portion provide a compliant zone that reduces stress concentration before forces are transmitted to the main insert body, preventing abnormal damage and cracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Reliability

If the binder-phase-rich layer thickness is increased, then deformation and stress are reduced, but insert complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechipping resistanceVSAvoidinsert structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by varying the binder phase content and layer thickness in specific regions. The center portion has a binder-phase-rich layer with thickness T1 (1-20 μm) and higher binder phase content, while end portions have a thinner layer with thickness T2 (0.2-6 μm) and lower binder phase content. This localized differentiation provides enhanced chipping resistance where needed without unnecessarily complicating the entire insert structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12233466B2Cermet insert and cutting tool provided with cermet insert
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 KYOCERA CORP
  • US12233466B2 patent drawing
  • US12233466B2 patent drawing
  • US12233466B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cermet insert includes a first surface, a second surface, a cutting edge, a third surface located opposite to the first surface, and a through hole extending from the first surface to the third surface. An inner wall constituting the through hole has, at least in a center portion, a binder-phase-rich layer having a higher binder phase content than an interior of the base. A thickness T1 of the binder-phase-rich layer at the center portion is larger than a thickness T2 of the binder-phase-rich layer at an end portion. The thickness T1 is 1 μm or more and 20 μm or less, the thickness T2 is 0.2 μm or more and 6 μm or less. The first surface includes a chip breaker. An arithmetic mean roughness Ra of the chip breaker is 0.05 μm or less when a cut-off value is 0.08 mm.