Certified Media Capture for Incident Reporting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current digital media capture systems lack the ability to consistently and securely collect and verify metadata associated with digital images, leading to inconsistencies and inaccuracies in positional and sensor data, which is crucial for applications like incident reporting.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes a media capture device to capture media assets and related metadata, which is then certified for authenticity and synchronized with a cloud server, allowing for secure storage and verification of digital media, including GPS and sensor data, to generate accurate incident reports.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional camera applications store photo metadata, then photo information is captured, but the metadata is inconsistent and unverifiable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetadata authenticityVSAvoidmetadata completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by capturing comprehensive metadata at the moment of photo acquisition, including GPS coordinates, sensor readings, and device information. This metadata is bundled and certified together with the photo before any potential tampering can occur, ensuring both completeness and authenticity from the outset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through cryptographic verification mechanisms that allow anyone to verify the authenticity of metadata accompanying a photo. The certification process creates a verifiable link between the photo and its metadata, providing continuous feedback on data integrity throughout the photo's lifecycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If positional and sensor data are collected for photos, then location accuracy is improved, but data security and verification become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition accuracyVSAvoidverification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges positional data, sensor readings, device information, and photo data into a single certified bundle. This integration simplifies verification by providing a unified authentication mechanism that covers all data types simultaneously, rather than requiring separate verification processes for each data type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces cryptographic certificates as an intermediary that mediates between the complex sensor data collection and the simple verification process. The certificate acts as a trusted intermediary that encapsulates all verification logic, making the process accessible without requiring users to understand the underlying complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If comprehensive metadata is captured with each photo, then data correlation is enhanced, but data security and tamper resistance become more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetadata correlationVSAvoiddata tamper resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary bundling and cryptographic certification of all metadata with the photo at the moment of capture. This preliminary action ensures that all data is correlated and protected together before any potential tampering can occur, establishing integrity from the outset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a composite data structure that combines photo data, metadata, and cryptographic certification into a single tamper-resistant unit. This composite structure ensures that any modification to any component would be detectable, providing robust tamper resistance while maintaining data correlation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Productivity

If digital photos are used in incident reports, then reporting efficiency is improved, but image authenticity cannot be verified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereporting efficiencyVSAvoidimage authenticity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces cryptographic certificates as an intermediary that provides authenticating information alongside photos in incident reports. This intermediary mechanism allows reports to maintain high efficiency while providing verifiable authenticity, as the certificate can be automatically verified without manual inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through verifiable authentication mechanisms that allow incident report reviewers to verify photo authenticity. The certification system provides immediate feedback on whether a photo has been tampered with, maintaining reporting efficiency while ensuring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11212416B2Secure digital media capture and analysis
Publication Date: 2021.12.28 IMAGEKEEPER LLC
  • US11212416B2 patent drawing
  • US11212416B2 patent drawing
  • US11212416B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for generating certified images, annotations, and incident reports are disclosed. A media capture device can be used to capture a media asset and related metadata. The image and its metadata can then be certified upon capture so that it can be verified as authentic and unaltered after certification. The certified media asset can then be included in or as a part of an incident report, which may optionally align multiple media assets along a path based on location and time of capture. The report may itself be certified and synchronized with a cloud server system.