Cervical Disc Implant Stacking and Bone Integrity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current treatments for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration often result in immobilization of the spine, leading to adjacent level degeneration and the need for multiple surgical procedures, which is undesirable for patient quality of life.

Innovation Solution

The development of a cervical intervertebral disc implant with saddle-shaped articulating surfaces and a design that allows for the offsetting of projections between successive implants, minimizing the risk of vertebral bone cracking and enabling the stacking of multiple implants.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional cervical disc treatments are used, then the spine is immobilized to treat degeneration, but adjacent level degeneration occurs and multiple surgical procedures are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidspine mobility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is divided into separate upper and lower articulating surfaces that can independently articulate with adjacent vertebrae, allowing each segment to move independently while maintaining overall spinal stability and preventing adjacent level degeneration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The implant incorporates dynamic articulating surfaces with saddle-shaped geometry that allow controlled motion between vertebrae, replacing static fusion with dynamic movement that preserves spinal mobility and reduces stress on adjacent levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If multiple implants are stacked to treat multiple disc levels, then mobility is improved, but vertebral bone cracking may occur due to misaligned projections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespine mobilityVSAvoidvertebral bone integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The implant features asymmetric projection positioning where the projection on one implant is deliberately offset from the projections on adjacent implants, creating a staggered configuration that prevents alignment of stress pathways and reduces the risk of vertebral bone cracking when multiple implants are stacked

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The offset projection design introduces a spatial dimension to the stacking configuration, where projections are arranged in an offset pattern across multiple implant levels, transforming a potentially problematic one-dimensional alignment issue into a three-dimensional distributed configuration that disperses stress

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12263099B2Intervertebral disc implants and tooling
Publication Date: 2025.04.01 VB SPINE LLC
  • US12263099B2 patent drawing
  • US12263099B2 patent drawing
  • US12263099B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A kit for preparing an intervertebral disc space for receiving an implant (100) includes a plurality of trials (152) having different sizes. Each trial (152) includes a body (154) insertible into an intervertebral disc space, the body (154) having a leading end (162), a trailing end (164), a top surface (156) and a bottom surface (160), the top surface of the body having a first groove (176) formed therein. Each implant also includes a flange (166) secured to the trailing end (164) of the body (154), the flange (166) having a first channel (180) aligned with the first groove (176), wherein each of the different sized trials has a different flange thickness. The flange thickness controls advancement of a cutting tool such as a chisel (192) into the first groove at the top surface of the trial body, which controls the depth of the cut into vertebral bone.