Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation for Restoring Tetraplegic Hand Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Serious spinal cord injuries often result in complete loss of sensory motor function below the level of the spinal lesion, leading to rare improvements in hand function, especially in tetraplegic subjects, limiting their independence and daily life activities.

Innovation Solution

Applying spinal cord stimulation, either transcutaneous or epidural, combined with selective pharmaceuticals like monoaminergic agonists, to neuromodulate the cervical spinal cord and facilitate voluntary control of hand function by exploiting the spinal circuitry's ability to interpret proprioceptive information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If spinal cord stimulation is applied to restore hand function in tetraplegic subjects, then hand strength and motor control are improved, but the complexity of the treatment device and protocol increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehand strengthVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The treatment protocol is segmented into multiple components: transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) applied to specific cervical segments (C3-C6), combined with selective pharmaceutical administration (monoaminergic agonists like buspirone or dopaminergic agonists like apomorphine). This segmentation allows each component to target specific physiological mechanisms, improving hand function while maintaining manageable device complexity through modular treatment delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces pharmaceutical agents as intermediaries that enhance the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation. Monoaminergic agonists and dopaminergic agonists act as mediators that modulate spinal cord circuitry excitability, thereby amplifying the functional recovery effects of tSCS. This intermediary approach allows lower stimulation intensities to achieve greater therapeutic effects, potentially reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If spinal cord stimulation combined with pharmaceuticals is used to improve hand function, then motor control and force generation are restored, but the treatment protocol becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor controlVSAvoidprotocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The treatment protocol employs preliminary action by administering pharmaceutical agents (monoaminergic agonists or dopaminergic agonists) before or concurrent with spinal cord stimulation to pre-condition the spinal cord circuitry. This preliminary pharmacological preparation enhances the responsiveness of spinal motor circuits to subsequent electrical stimulation, improving motor control outcomes while allowing for more efficient treatment delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by systematically varying stimulation parameters (frequency, amplitude, pulse width) and pharmaceutical dosages to optimize treatment effectiveness. By adjusting these parameters based on individual patient responses and treatment progress, the protocol achieves improved motor control while maintaining flexibility to simplify the overall approach through personalized parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method significantly improves hand strength and fine motor control in tetraplegic subjects, with mean hand strength increasing by over 300% in some cases, demonstrating the potential for functional and psychological recovery.

Implementation Method 1

neuromodulating the cervical spinal cord of the subject by administering stimulation to the cervical spinal cord or a region

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical stimulation: Electrical Impedance Tomography

Implementation Method 2

by administering to the subject at least one monoaminergic agonist

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPharmaceutical neuromodulation:

Data Source

PatentUS20260060941A1Engaging the cervical spinal cord circuitry to re-enable volitional control of hand function in tetraplegic subjects
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
  • US20260060941A1 patent drawing
  • US20260060941A1 patent drawing
  • US20260060941A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In various embodiments, methods are provided for applying transcutaneous and/or epidural spinal cord stimulation with and without selective pharmaceuticals to restore voluntary control of hand function in tetraplegic subjects.