Smoking Cessation Device with Adjustable Airflow Restriction
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current smoking cessation devices require continuous refills of cartridges containing chemicals, additives, and flavorings, which can have detrimental health effects.
Innovation Solution
A smoking cessation device configured to mimic a smoking implement, comprising an elongated body with mouth and air admittance openings, and an internal passageway that allows inhalation of uncontaminated ambient air, without the need for refills or additives.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of manufacture
If smoking cessation devices use cartridges containing chemicals and additives, then the device can provide flavoring and nicotine delivery, but it causes detrimental health effects from inhaling contaminants
Solution Approach 1:
The patent removes the harmful cartridges containing chemicals, additives, and flavorings from the smoking cessation device. The device is redesigned to function without these consumable components, allowing users to inhale only filtered ambient air through a simple tube structure, thereby eliminating the source of health-harmful substances while maintaining the cessation function.
Solution Approach 2:
The device mimics the external appearance and basic inhalation function of traditional smoking implements without replicating their harmful internal components. It creates a visual and functional copy of the smoking experience (handheld tube, mouthpiece, inhalation action) while using only clean ambient air, thus satisfying the psychological aspect of cessation without the health risks.
2Ease of operation
If the device allows free flow of ambient air, then it provides easy inhalation, but it fails to mimic the satisfying 'drag' sensation of smoking
Solution Approach 1:
The patent incorporates an adjustable flow restriction mechanism that allows users to dynamically control the airflow resistance through the device. By adjusting the restriction, users can customize the inhalation experience to match their desired drag sensation, transforming a static free-flow design into a dynamic, user-adaptable system that mimics the variable resistance of traditional smoking.
3Adaptability or versatility
If the device includes flow restriction mechanisms, then it can provide satisfying drag sensation, but it increases device complexity
Solution Approach 1:
The flow restriction mechanism is localized to a specific section of the device (the tubular body) rather than being distributed throughout the entire system. This concentrated approach allows for effective airflow control while minimizing overall device complexity, as only a portion of the device requires the adjustable restriction feature rather than the entire structure.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The device provides a healthy alternative for smoking cessation by allowing users to inhale pure ambient air, reducing the risk of health side effects associated with chemical inhalation, and offering a satisfying 'drag' sensation through adjustable airflow restriction.
Implementation Method 1
an internal passageway by which the one or more air admittance openings are fluidly intercommunicated with the mouth opening
Data Source
AI summary
A smoking cessation device features a handheld elongated body one or more mouth openings at or near the one end and receivable in a mouth of the user in a gripped state of the body between lips of the user, and at a distance from the mouth opening(s), one or more air admittance openings through which ambient air is introducible into the elongated body near another end thereof. An entirely empty internal passageway fluidly communicates the air admittance opening(s) with the mouth opening(s) such that inhalation by the user with the device in the working position is operable to draw only ambient air, with zero additives, into the mouth of the user. Preferably one or more flow restrictors are provided to mimic the drag of a cigarette or pull of a vape, preferably in accompaniment with a flow adjuster for variable control over such flow restriction for personalized experience.