CFD Wind Models for UAS Bridge Inspection Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) face challenges during bridge inspections due to limited visibility, weakened wireless signals, and safety concerns related to wind turbulence and GPS signal obstruction.

Innovation Solution

Generating computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of bridge structures and surrounding areas to provide UAS operators with 3D models and wind flow data, enabling improved navigation and hazard identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If UAS operators rely on GPS navigation during bridge inspections, then navigation accuracy is improved, but GPS signal obstruction by bridge structures causes loss of positioning information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoidGPS positioning information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces CFD wind flow models as an intermediary information source to compensate for lost GPS positioning data. When GPS signals are obstructed by bridge structures, the pre-computed wind flow models provide alternative navigational reference data, allowing operators to maintain accurate positioning through wind pattern recognition and model-based prediction rather than direct GPS signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs CFD simulations and generates wind flow models in advance before actual bridge inspection operations. This preliminary action creates a database of expected wind patterns and flow characteristics around the bridge structure, which can be referenced during GPS-denied operations to maintain navigation accuracy without real-time external signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If UAS operators gain more training experience to handle challenging bridge inspection conditions, then operational confidence and safety are improved, but training time and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational safetyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of bridge structures with associated CFD wind flow models that replicate real-world conditions. These digital twins serve as training environments where operators can practice bridge inspections without requiring extensive real-world flight time, thereby reducing training duration while maintaining safety standards through realistic scenario simulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If UAS systems operate in areas with significant wind turbulence and shear around bridge structures, then inspection capability is improved, but wind velocity changes and shear locations create navigation challenges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection capabilityVSAvoidnavigation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where pre-computed CFD wind flow models provide continuous reference information about expected wind conditions at different locations around the bridge. During operations, operators can compare actual sensor readings with model predictions to detect changes in wind velocity and shear locations, enabling proactive navigation adjustments and maintaining operational stability despite turbulent conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250036838A1Computational fluid dynamic modeling methods for unmanned aerial systems
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 PURDUE RES FOUND
  • US20250036838A1 patent drawing
  • US20250036838A1 patent drawing
  • US20250036838A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of generating computational models representative of bridges include receiving a first user input representative of a bridge, receiving a second user input representative of the bridge, generating a three-dimensional (3D) bridge model based upon the second user input, generating a computation fluid dynamics (CFD) model representative of an area surrounding the bridge, and performing a CFD analysis on the mesh model to generate output results. The first user input includes a bridge type selection from a plurality of stored bridge types. Each of the plurality of stored bridge types correlates to a plurality of bridge parameters. The second user input includes a plurality of bridge parameters correlating to the first user input.