CFRP Machining Control via Adaptive Speed and Feed

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current carbon fiber reinforced plastic machining methods using computer-aided machining (CAM) software face challenges in accurately machining complex shapes and managing the properties of heterogeneous materials, leading to issues like delamination and inefficient hole creation, particularly due to limitations in controlling machining processes and tool attitudes.

Innovation Solution

Development of embedded software that determines machining grades based on rotational speed and feeding speed of the spindle, allowing for customized processing conditions tailored to specific machining targets and processes, enabling precise control of machining operations such as drilling, milling, and orbital milling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If five-axis machining technique using three linear feeding axes and two rotary feeding axes is used to machine complex shapes, then machining capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces CAM software as an intermediary between the operator and the complex five-axis machining system. The software automatically generates toolpaths and controls tool attitudes, mediating the complexity of coordinating five axes (three linear + two rotary) and converting it into automated, programmable operations. This resolves the contradiction by hiding the device complexity behind a software interface while maintaining full machining capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional CAM software is used for machining carbon fiber reinforced plastics, then general machining functions are provided, but machining precision deteriorates due to lack of material-specific control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining functionVSAvoidmachining precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing machining parameters and control strategies specifically tailored to carbon fiber reinforced plastic materials. The system adjusts cutting speeds, feed rates, and toolpaths based on the anisotropic properties and delamination risks specific to CFRP, rather than using generic machining parameters. This localized optimization maintains ease of manufacture while significantly improving machining precision for this specific material type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If trial and error method is used to machine holes with large depth-to-diameter ratio, then hole creation function is achieved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehole creation capabilityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and optimizing the toolpath for holes with large depth-to-diameter ratios before actual machining. The CAM software generates the complete, optimized toolpath in advance, determining the exact sequence of cutting passes, tool attitudes, and feed rates needed. This eliminates trial-and-error during production, maintaining the ability to create complex holes while dramatically improving productivity through predetermined, optimized processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10534348B2Carbon fiber reinforced plastic machining method using computer aided machining program
Publication Date: 2020.01.14 KOREA INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY
  • US10534348B2 patent drawing
  • US10534348B2 patent drawing
  • US10534348B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a carbon fiber reinforced plastic machining method using CAM which includes the step (S10) of determining machining grade in accordance with a machining target and the step (S20) of determining machining grade in accordance with a machining process, in which the machining grade is a processing condition which is determined in accordance with the rotational speed and the feeding speed of a spindle as a machining tool.