CGRP-Antagonist Compounds for Migraine Treatment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current CGRP-antagonists for treating migraine and other conditions have limitations in efficacy and side effects, and there is a need for more effective compounds with improved pharmacological properties.

Innovation Solution

Development of specific compounds of general formula I, which are CGRP-antagonists, including various structural embodiments and their physiologically acceptable salts, that exhibit strong affinities for CGRP receptors and display effective antagonistic properties in pharmacological tests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current CGRP-antagonists are used for treating migraine, then treatment is provided, but efficacy is limited and side effects occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacyVSAvoidside effects
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the chemical structure of CGRP-antagonist compounds through systematic variation of substituents at specific positions (R1, R2, R3, R4, X groups) to optimize the balance between efficacy and side effects. This involves changing molecular parameters such as hydrophobicity, steric bulk, and electronic properties to improve therapeutic index

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite molecular structures combining multiple functional groups (amino acids, aromatic rings, heterocyclic systems, carboxylic acid derivatives) in specific configurations to create CGRP-antagonists with enhanced pharmacological properties. The composite nature of these molecules allows simultaneous optimization of binding affinity and reduced off-target effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If CGRP-antagonist compounds are developed with stronger affinity, then antagonistic activity increases, but molecular complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantagonistic activityVSAvoidmolecular structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the CGRP-antagonist molecule into distinct functional domains: an N-terminal region with specific amino acid sequences, a central hydrophobic core with variable substituents, and a C-terminal region containing carboxylic acid groups. This modular architecture allows independent optimization of each segment for binding affinity while maintaining overall structural manageability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by introducing specific functional groups at predetermined positions within the molecular structure. Each substituent (R1-R4) is strategically placed to provide localized interactions with specific residues in the CGRP receptor binding pocket, enhancing affinity without requiring global structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7696209B2CGRP-antagonists, process for preparing them and their use as pharmaceutical compositions
Publication Date: 2010.04.13 BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INT GMBH
  • US7696209B2 patent drawing
  • US7696209B2 patent drawing
  • US7696209B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to the CGRP-antagonists of general formula Iwherein R1, R2, R3, R4 and X are defined as in claim 1, the tautomers, the isomers, the diastereomers, the enantiomers, the hydrates, mixtures and salts thereof and the hydrates of the salts, particularly the physiologically acceptable salts thereof with inorganic or organic acids or bases, as well as those compounds of general formula I in which one or more hydrogen atoms are replaced by deuterium, pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds, the use thereof and processes for the preparation thereof.