Hybrid Corn Variety CH010366 for Controlled Pollination Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing corn breeding methods struggle to develop hybrids with stable, uniform, and desirable traits such as increased yield, disease resistance, and improved agronomic qualities, often requiring extensive selection and cross-pollination techniques.

Innovation Solution

The development of the hybrid corn variety CH010366, which incorporates genetic modifications and cytoplasmic traits like male sterility, along with specific heritable traits and genetic loci for resistance to diseases and herbicides, and can be produced through controlled cross-pollination and tissue culture techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional self-pollination breeding methods are used, then genetic uniformity is maintained, but genetic diversity and introduction of new traits are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintroduction of new genetic modifications and traitsVSAvoidgenetic stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The breeding program segments the breeding population into distinct inbred lines with specific desirable traits. Each inbred line is genetically stabilized through self-pollination, then these segmented lines are crossed to combine traits in the hybrid generation, resolving the contradiction between genetic stability and diversity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the genome are treated differently - some loci are maintained in homozygous state for stability while other loci are kept heterozygous to introduce new traits. The hybrid variety contains both homozygous regions (for stability) and heterozygous regions (for new traits and vigor)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If cross-pollination is used to combine desirable traits, then genetic diversity and new traits are achieved, but self-pollination control becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombination of desirable traitsVSAvoidpollination control mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The male reproductive capability is extracted or removed from one parent (through male sterility) to prevent self-pollination and control cross-pollination. This simplifies the pollination control mechanism by eliminating the need for manual emasculation or isolation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

A cytoplasmic male sterility factor acts as an intermediary mechanism to control pollination. This cytoplasmic factor mediates the interaction between parental lines, ensuring controlled cross-pollination while maintaining breeding program efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If male sterility factors are introduced to prevent self-pollination, then controlled cross-pollination is achieved, but genetic complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrolled pollinationVSAvoidgenetic modification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The male sterile line automatically prevents self-pollination through its cytoplasmic or nuclear factor, without requiring external intervention. The plant itself provides the mechanism for controlled pollination, simplifying breeding operations despite the genetic complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The breeding program manages genetic complexity by carefully controlling which genetic parameters are modified. Male sterility is introduced at specific genetic loci while maintaining stability at other loci, balancing controllability with manageable complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If extensive breeding programs are implemented to develop superior inbreds, then desirable characteristics are achieved, but time and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuperior inbred plantsVSAvoidbreeding program duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Inbred lines are developed and stabilized in advance before being combined into hybrids. This preliminary development of pure lines accelerates the overall breeding process by having ready-to-use genetic material with known desirable traits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple inbred lines with different desirable traits are merged through controlled crossing to create hybrid varieties that combine all advantages. This consolidates the results of extensive breeding programs into single superior varieties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12622379B2Plants and seeds of hybrid corn variety CH010366
Publication Date: 2026.05.12 MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC

AI summary

According to the invention, there is provided seed and plants of the hybrid corn variety designated CH010366. The invention thus relates to the plants, seeds and tissue cultures of the variety CH010366, and to methods for producing a corn plant produced by crossing a corn plant of variety CH010366 with itself or with another corn plant, such as a plant of another variety. The invention further relates to genetic complements of plants of variety CH010366.