Chain Joint Hub Structure for Internal Robotic Arm Cable Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic arm systems face challenges in cable routing, particularly in internal cable routing through chain joints, which can lead to cable damage, reduced strength capacity, and limited range of motion, while external routing affects the system's profile and increases the risk of cable entanglement.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a mechanical joint design with a hub that allows for internal cable routing without compromising the chain joint's strength or profile, using a flexible mechanical drive system with a hub that routes cables through dedicated passages, maintaining the chain's width and ensuring cables do not bend beyond their minimum radius, thus preventing damage and maintaining system integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If cables are routed externally along the robotic mechanism, then cable routing is simple and accessible, but the outer profile is affected and cables are at risk of getting caught in objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable routing simplicityVSAvoidouter profile
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The cable routing system is nested within the robotic mechanism structure. Cables are routed through the interior of the robotic arm, passing through seals and guides integrated into the joint structure, allowing the mechanism to maintain a streamlined outer profile while keeping cables protected and accessible for maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Shape

If cables are routed internally through the robotic mechanism, then the outer profile is streamlined and the system is sealed against liquids and gases, but the strength capacity is decreased and joint size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveouter profile uniformityVSAvoidstrength capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The hub structure is designed with differentiated local properties: the outer hub maintains full chain width for strength, while the inner hub creates a dedicated cable passage. This local differentiation allows the cable routing area to be optimized for cable protection while the surrounding structure maintains full load-bearing capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The cable passage is created by offsetting the inner hub relative to the outer hub, utilizing the radial dimension to create a dedicated cable routing path. This dimensional approach allows cables to pass through the joint without compromising the axial strength capacity of the chain connection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If cables are routed internally through the robotic mechanism, then the system is sealed against liquids and gases, but cables are at risk of damage via twisting, bending, and exposure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental sealingVSAvoidcable damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Seals are positioned at the interface between the inner and outer hubs, acting as intermediaries that prevent liquid and gas penetration into the cable passage. These seals protect the routed cables from environmental contaminants while allowing the cables to pass through the sealed barrier

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The hub design preliminarily establishes a protected cable passage with integrated seals and guides before the cables are installed. This pre-configured structure ensures cables are immediately protected from bending, twisting, and environmental exposure upon installation, preventing damage before operation begins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of manufacture

If the chain width is reduced to accommodate cable routing, then cables can be routed internally, but the total strength capacity of the chain joint is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinternal cable routing capabilityVSAvoidtotal strength capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The hub is segmented into an outer hub and an inner hub, with the chain passing through the outer hub and cables passing through the inner hub. This segmentation allows the chain width to be determined by the outer hub dimensions, maintaining full strength capacity, while the inner hub provides a separate, smaller passage for cables without interfering with the chain's load-bearing function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3233392B1Systems and methods for chain joint cable routing
Publication Date: 2024.01.17 VEOLIA NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS INC
  • EP3233392B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3233392B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3233392B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to cable routing approaches that allow cables (1000) to pass through a traditional chain joint (100) without reducing the strength capacity or impairing the range of motion of the joint. The routing approaches permit the cables (1000) to be housed inside the structure of the robotic arm (150) and pass through the chain joint in a manner that does not limit the width of the chain (120).