Chainable Syntax Framework for Data Transformation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing programming languages have complex syntaxes that make it difficult for non-expert programmers to create, understand, and debug code, and they require a large number of lines to code tasks, leading to inefficiencies in coding, collaboration, and debugging.

Innovation Solution

The Continuous Transformation Framework (CTF) Syntax provides a more compact and readable programming syntax that supports chainable actions, allowing for continuous transformations of data and simplifying code management and debugging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If existing programming languages are used, then programming functionality is achieved, but syntax complexity increases and readability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode readabilityVSAvoidsyntax complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The programming task is divided into discrete, named blocks (e.g., Data Preparation, Transformation, Aggregation) that can be independently understood and assembled. Each block has a clear purpose and uses consistent syntax patterns, making the overall code more readable and easier to operate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The syntax is designed to change parameters of data structures and operations in a clear, declarative manner. Instead of complex imperative statements, the syntax uses parameter assignments and transformations that directly express the intended data manipulation, improving both readability and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If detailed coding is performed, then programming functionality is achieved, but the number of lines of code increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoding speedVSAvoidnumber of code lines
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The syntax provides universal operators and methods that can perform multiple functions. The same syntax pattern can be used for different data types and operations, reducing the need for repetitive code and abbreviating the overall program length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If complex code blocks are written, then programming functionality is achieved, but collaboration difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollaboration easeVSAvoidcode structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The code is segmented into logically named blocks that can be independently understood by different developers. Each block has a clear purpose and uses consistent syntax, making it easier to collaborate on specific sections without needing to understand the entire codebase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The syntax maintains homogeneity across different parts of the code through consistent naming conventions, operator patterns, and structural rules. This uniformity makes it easier for developers to collaborate by reducing the cognitive load required to understand different code sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

4Reliability

If traditional programming syntax is used, then programming functionality is achieved, but debugging time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebug detection easeVSAvoiddebugging time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The syntax uses visual differentiation through naming conventions and structural patterns that make errors stand out. Misplaced operators, incorrect data types, and logical errors are more easily detected because they break the consistent visual patterns of the syntax, reducing debugging time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The syntax is designed to provide immediate feedback on errors through clear syntax errors and type checking. When a mistake is made, the error message directly indicates the problem location and cause, making debugging faster and more reliable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250165250A1Continuous transformation framework syntax
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 XANO INC
  • US20250165250A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165250A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165250A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer programs are presented for the use of a syntax framework for data transformation. A Continuous Transformation Framework (CTF) Syntax is presented that supports chainable actions that allow for continuous transformations on the original data. The CTF syntax closely resembles natural language, improves readability so code is easier to understand and read, reduces or eliminates the need for complex loops, and allows the easy traversal of arrays. The CTF framework's ability to return the original object in its transformed state enables continuous transformations and simplifies the overall process.