Chair and chair control assemblies, systems, and methods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing chair motion control systems lack a compact and effective design for synchronous raising and tilting motions, and secure tilt securement, with limited adjustment options for seating assemblies.

Innovation Solution

A chair control cartridge system featuring a seat support, link arm, and control body with pivotable riders and slots, allowing for synchronized raising and lowering of the seat support, along with a tilt lock assembly for secure positioning, and adjustable channels for forward and rearward motion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a chair control system uses traditional weight-activated or synchrotilt mechanisms, then basic chair motion is achieved, but the design lacks compactness and effectiveness for synchronous raising and tilting motions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system designVSAvoidsynchronous raising and tilting motion
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into separate functional modules: a control body with slots, riders mounted on the seat support, and a link arm with pivot link. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently while working together to achieve synchronous raising and tilting motions, resolving the contradiction between compact design and effective operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The riders act as intermediaries between the seat support and the control body slots. As the link arm pivots, the riders traverse along the slots, translating the pivot motion into coordinated raising and tilting of the seat support. This intermediary mechanism enables effective synchronous motion while maintaining a compact overall design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the control body includes slots and riders for seat support movement, then synchronous raising and lowering is achieved, but the mechanism complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronous raising and lowering motionVSAvoidcontrol body structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control body with its slots and the riders serve multiple functions simultaneously: they guide the motion path, transmit force, and enable both raising and lowering operations through a single pivoting action of the link arm. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate mechanisms for each operation, achieving synchronous motion without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic elements including pivoting link arms, sliding riders along slots, and a pivot link that rotates to control motion. These dynamic components allow the mechanism to adapt its configuration during operation, achieving smooth synchronous raising and lowering motions while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure compared to rigid multi-component systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If a tilt lock assembly is added for secure positioning, then tilt securement is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetilt securementVSAvoidcontrol assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tilt lock assembly appears to be integrated into the existing control body and link arm mechanism, utilizing the same pivoting and slot-rider interactions to achieve locking. The mechanism likely uses the natural positions of the riders in the slots or specific pivot points to provide secure positioning without requiring entirely separate locking components, thus improving reliability while minimizing additional complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Adaptability or versatility

If forward and rearward adjustment channels are provided, then seating assembly adjustability is improved, but the mechanism complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseating assembly adjustmentVSAvoidcontrol assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system incorporates adjustment channels that allow the seat support to move not only vertically (raising/lowering) but also in forward and rearward directions. This adds a spatial dimension to the adjustment capability, enabling multi-directional positioning of the seat assembly. The slots and riders mechanism naturally accommodates these additional degrees of freedom without requiring fundamentally different control structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS9801471B2Chair and chair control assemblies, systems, and methods
Publication Date: 2017.10.31 HNI TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US9801471B2 patent drawing
  • US9801471B2 patent drawing
  • US9801471B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Chairs, seating systems, chair sub-assemblies and sub-systems, and associated methods of assembly and use. Aspects relate to chairs and methods of assembling chairs including chair controls of a relatively compact and effective design with desirable synchronous raising and tilting motions. Aspects also relate to tilt lock assemblies for achieving secure and effective tilt securement. Additional aspects relate to forward and rearward adjustment, or extension and retraction, of a seating assembly of the chair.